ArticleNeuro-oncology2022
Body CT and PET/CT detection of extracranial lymphoma in patients with newly diagnosed central nervous system lymphoma.
Article in Neuro-oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Minimizing the risks of stereotactic brain biopsy in suspected central nervous system lymphoma: a retrospective database study.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2026Article
- Advances in primary large B-cell lymphoma of immune-privileged sites.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Review
- Comparison of PET/CT and PET/MRI in central nervous system tumors, a narrative review.International journal of physiology, pathophysiology and pharmacology · 2024Review
- Use of "Diagnostic Yield" in Imaging Research Reports: Results from Articles Published in Two General Radiology Journals.Korean journal of radiology · 2022Article
- Body imaging for newly diagnosed CNS lymphoma: Evaluating the utility of the evaluation.Neuro-oncology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
18 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundWe aimed to investigate the detection rate of body CT or PET/CT for sites of extracranial disease in patients with a new pathological diagnosis of CNS DLBCL and to identify factors associated with sites of extracranial disease.
methodsAn international multicenter cohort study of consecutive immunocompetent patients with a new diagnosis of CNS DLBCL confirmed by brain biopsy who underwent CT and/or PET/CT to evaluate for sites of extracranial disease between 1998 and 2019. The primary outcome was the detection rate of extracranial lymphoma by CT or PET/CT. Subgroup analyses according to age and EBV status were also performed. Logistic regression analyses were performed to determine factors related to sites of extracranial disease. Detection rates of CT and PET/CT were compared.
resultsOne thousand and forty-three patients were included. The overall detection rate of CT or PET/CT was 2.6% (27/1043). The treatment approach was adjusted in 74% of these patients. Multivariable analysis demonstrated that age >61 years (OR, 3.10; P = .016) and EBV positivity (OR, 3.78; P = .045) were associated with greater odds of extracranial lymphoma. There was no statistically significant difference in detection rate between CT and PET/CT (P = .802). In patients ≤61 years old, the false-referral rates were significantly higher than the detection rates (P < .001).
conclusionOur results showed increased odds of extracranial lymphoma in patients with older age or EBV-positive lymphoma. Treatment was adjusted in a majority of patients diagnosed with extracranial lymphoma, thereby supporting the current guidelines for the use of contrast-enhanced body CT or PET/CT in patients with newly diagnosed CNS DLBCL.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.