Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34611592›Full record

ArticleJOR spine2021

Structure-function relationships of the human vertebral endplate.

Yuanqiao Wu, Johnfredy Loaiza, Rohin Banerji, Olivia Blouin, Elise Morgan

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JOR spine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. C- VBQ versus CT Hounsfield units in predicting cage subsidence following ACDF: a retrospective cohort analysis.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Risk of bony endplate failure during vertebral fracture.Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Genetics of Intervertebral Disc Degeneration.Current osteoporosis reports · 2023
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yuanqiao WuDepartment of Mechanical Engineering Boston University Boston Massachusetts USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4577-585X
Johnfredy LoaizaDepartment of Mechanical Engineering Boston University Boston Massachusetts USA.
Rohin BanerjiDepartment of Biomedical Engineering Boston University Boston Massachusetts USA.
Olivia BlouinDepartment of Biomedical Engineering Boston University Boston Massachusetts USA.
Elise MorganDepartment of Mechanical Engineering Boston University Boston Massachusetts USA.
Boston University · US

Funding

3-D Visualization and Prediction of Vertebral FracturesR01AR054620 · NIAMS · BOSTON UNIVERSITY (CHARLES RIVER CAMPUS) · PI MORGAN, ELISE F · 2008 to 2025
$6.7M
3-D Visualization and Prediction of Vertebral FracturesR56AR054620 · NIAMS · BOSTON UNIVERSITY (CHARLES RIVER CAMPUS) · PI MORGAN, ELISE F · 2013 to 2013
$364k
MICRO-COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY SYSTEM: LYMPHOMAS10RR021072 · NCRR · BOSTON UNIVERSITY · PI MORGAN, ELISE F · 2005 to 2005
$210k
NCRR NIH HHS S10 RR021072NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR054620NIAMS NIH HHS R56 AR054620
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough deformation and fracture of the vertebral endplate have been implicated in spinal conditions such as vertebral fracture and disc degeneration, few biomechanical studies of this structure are available. The goal of this study was to quantify the mechanical behavior of the vertebral endplate.

methodsEight-five rectangular specimens were dissected from the superior and/or inferior central endplates of human lumbar spine segments L1 to L4. Micro-computed tomography (μCT) imaging, four-point-bend testing, and ashing were performed to quantify the apparent elastic modulus and yield stress (modulus and yield stress, respectively, of the porous vertebral endplate), tissue yield stress (yield stress of the tissue of the vertebral endplate, excluding pores), ultimate strain, fracture strain, bone volume fraction (BV/TV), bone mineral density (BMD), and various measures of tissue density and composition (tissue mineral density, ash fraction, and ash density). Regression was used to assess the dependence of mechanical properties on density and composition.

resultsWide variations in elastic and failure properties, and in density and tissue composition, were observed. BMD and BV/TV were good predictors of many of the apparent-level mechanical properties, including modulus, yield stress, and in the case of the inferior vertebral endplate, failure strains. Similar values of the mechanical properties were noted between superior and inferior vertebral endplates. In contrast to the dependence of apparent stiffness and strength on BMD and BV/TV, none of the mechanical properties depended on any of the tissue-level density measurements.

conclusionThe dependence of many of the mechanical properties of the vertebral endplate on BV/TV and BMD suggests possibilities for noninvasive assessment of how this region of the spine behaves during habitual and injurious loading. Further study of the nonmineral components of the endplate tissue is required to understand how the composition of this tissue may influence the overall mechanical behavior of the vertebral endplate.

Indexed as

bendingdensityfracturemicro‐computed tomographyvertebral endplate

Identifiers

PMID34611592
PMCPMC8479528
OpenAlexW3199827575

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.