ReviewJournal of cognition2021
Assessing the Evidence for Asymmetrical Switch Costs and Reversed Language Dominance Effects - A Meta-Analysis.
Review in Journal of cognition, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- A qualitative systematic review of individual differences in Stroop task performance among healthy adults.Psychological research · 2026Pooled it
- Proactive Control in Bilingual Language Switching: Evidence from Cue-Based Preparation in Croatian-German Children.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Switching-back versus switching-out: Language context reveals a novel aging deficit in proactive bilingual language control.Cognition · 2026Article
- The influence of prediction on bilingual language production: evidence from semantic classifier congruency.Psychological research · 2025Article
- Arithmetic in the Bilingual Brain: Language of Learning and Language Experience Effects on Simple Arithmetic in Children and Adults.Mind, brain and education : the official journal of the International Mind, Brain, and Education Society · 2024Article
- Language switching when writing: The role of phonological and orthographic overlap.Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006) · 2024Article
- Mixed-Language Input and Infant Volubility: Friend or Foe?Bilingualism (Cambridge, England) · 2023Article
- Proactive and reactive language control in bilingual language production revealed by decoding sustained potentials and electroencephalography oscillations.Human brain mapping · 2023Article
- The Effects of Cognitive Control on the Subcomponents of Language Control in Spoken and Written Productions.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- The dynamic role of inhibitory control in language switching during number-word task performance in dominant and balanced bilinguals.Cognitive processing · 2023Article
- Inhibitory control of the dominant language: Reversed language dominance is the tip of the iceberg.Journal of memory and language · 2023Article
- Are some effector systems harder to switch to? In search of cost asymmetries when switching between manual, vocal, and oculomotor tasks.Memory & cognition · 2022Article
- Assessing Proactive Language Control: Does Predictability of Language Sequences Benefit Language Switching?Journal of cognition · 2022Article
- Language switching may facilitate the processing of negative responses.Frontiers in psychology · 2022Article
- Correction: Assessing the Evidence for Asymmetrical Switch Costs and Reversed Language Dominance Effects - A Meta-Analysis.Journal of cognition · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Two seemingly counterintuitive phenomena - asymmetrical language switch costs and the reversed language dominance effect - prove to be particularly controversial in the literature on language control. Asymmetrical language switch costs refer to the larger costs for switching into the dominant language compared to switching into the less dominant language, both relative to staying in either one language. The reversed language dominance effect refers to longer reaction times when in the more dominant of the two languages in situations that require frequent language switching (i.e., mixed-language blocks). The asymmetrical language switch costs are commonly taken as an index for processes of transient, reactive inhibitory language control, whereas the reversed language dominance effect is taken as an index for sustained, proactive inhibitory language control. In the present meta-analysis, we set out to establish the empirical evidence for these two phenomena using a Bayesian linear mixed effects modelling approach. Despite the observation of both phenomena in some studies, our results suggest that overall, there is little evidence for the generality and robustness of these two effects, and this holds true even when conditions - such as language proficiency and preparation time manipulations - were included as moderators of these phenomena. We conclude that asymmetrical switch costs and the reversed language dominance effect are important for theory development, but their utility for theory testing is limited due to their lack of robustness and the absence of confirmed moderatory variables.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.