Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34611522›Full record

ArticleResearch and reports in urology2021

Identifying Risk Factors for MRI-Invisible Prostate Cancer in Patients Undergoing Transperineal Saturation Biopsy.

Alberto Artiles Medina, Rafael Rodríguez-Patrón Rodríguez, Mercedes Ruiz Hernández, Marina Mata Alcaraz, Silvia García Barreras, Guillermo Fernández Conejo, Agustín Fraile Poblador, Enrique Sanz Mayayo, Francisco Javier Burgos Revilla

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Research and reports in urology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Alberto Artiles MedinaDepartment of Urology, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, University of Alcalá, Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-0930-0344
Rafael Rodríguez-Patrón RodríguezDepartment of Urology, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, University of Alcalá, Madrid, Spain.
Mercedes Ruiz HernándezDepartment of Urology, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, University of Alcalá, Madrid, Spain.
Marina Mata AlcarazDepartment of Urology, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, University of Alcalá, Madrid, Spain.
Silvia García BarrerasDepartment of Urology, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, University of Alcalá, Madrid, Spain.
Guillermo Fernández ConejoDepartment of Urology, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, University of Alcalá, Madrid, Spain.
Agustín Fraile PobladorDepartment of Urology, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, University of Alcalá, Madrid, Spain.
Enrique Sanz MayayoDepartment of Urology, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, University of Alcalá, Madrid, Spain.
Francisco Javier Burgos RevillaDepartment of Urology, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, University of Alcalá, Madrid, Spain.
Universidad de Alcalá · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeProstatic multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) has markedly improved the assessment of men with suspected prostate cancer (PCa). Nevertheless, as mpMRI exhibits a high negative predictive value, a negative MRI may represent a diagnostic dilemma. The aim of this study was to evaluate the incidence of positive transperineal saturation biopsy in men who have negative mpMRI and to analyse the factors associated with positive biopsy in this scenario. PATIENTS AND

methodsA retrospective study of men with normal mpMRI and suspicion of PCa who underwent saturation biopsy (≥20 cores) was carried out. A total of 580 patients underwent transperineal MRI/transrectal ultrasound fusion targeted biopsies or saturation prostate biopsies from January 2017 to September 2020. Of them, 73 had a pre-biopsy negative mpMRI (with Prostate Imaging - Reporting and Data System, PI-RADS, ≤2) and were included in this study. Demographics, clinical characteristics, data regarding biopsy results and potential predictive factors of positive saturation biopsy were collected. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to identify independent risk factors for MRI-invisible PCa.

resultsThe detection rate of PCa with saturation biopsy in patients with negative MRI was 34/73 (46.58%). Out of 34 MRI-invisible prostate cancers detected, 12 (35.29%) were clinically significant PCa (csPCa) forms. Regarding factors of positive biopsy, in univariate analysis, the use of 5-alpha reductase inhibitors and free:total prostate-specific antigen (PSA) ratio were associated with the result of the saturation biopsy. In multivariate analysis, only an unfavourable free:total PSA ratio remained a risk factor (OR 11.03, CI95% 1.93-63.15, p=0.01). Furthermore, multivariate logistic analysis demonstrated that prostate volume >50mL significantly predicts the absence of csPCa on saturation biopsy (OR 0.11, 95% CI 0.01-0.94, p=0.04).

conclusionA free:total PSA ratio <20% is a risk factor for MRI-invisible PCa. Saturation biopsy could be considered in patients with suspected PCa, despite having a negative MRI.

Indexed as

clinically significant prostate cancermulti-parametric magnetic resonance imagingnegative MRIprostate cancersaturation biopsy

Identifiers

PMID34611522
PMCPMC8486270
OpenAlexW3201659599

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.