Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34611481›Full record

ArticleOncotarget2021

Safety and initial efficacy of ablative radioembolization for the treatment of unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.

Ricardo Paz-Fumagalli, Jacob Core, Carlos Padula, Seyed Montazeri, John McKinney, Gregory Frey, Zlatko Devcic, Andrew Lewis, Charles Ritchie, Kabir Mody and 2 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oncotarget, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Radiological Loco-Regional Treatments for Cholangiocarcinoma: A Systematic Review of the Literature.Liver international : official journal of the International Association for the Study of the Liver · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ricardo Paz-FumagalliDepartment of Radiology, Division of Interventional Radiology, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, FL 32224, USA.
Jacob CoreDepartment of Radiology, Division of Interventional Radiology, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, FL 32224, USA.
Carlos PadulaDepartment of Radiology, Division of Interventional Radiology, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, FL 32224, USA.
Seyed MontazeriDepartment of Radiology, Division of Interventional Radiology, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, FL 32224, USA.
John McKinneyDepartment of Radiology, Division of Interventional Radiology, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, FL 32224, USA.
Gregory FreyDepartment of Radiology, Division of Interventional Radiology, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, FL 32224, USA.
Zlatko DevcicDepartment of Radiology, Division of Interventional Radiology, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, FL 32224, USA.
Andrew LewisDepartment of Radiology, Division of Interventional Radiology, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, FL 32224, USA.
Charles RitchieDepartment of Radiology, Division of Interventional Radiology, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, FL 32224, USA.
Kabir ModyDivision of Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, FL 32224, USA.
Sunil KrishnanDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, FL 32224, USA.
Beau ToskichDepartment of Radiology, Division of Interventional Radiology, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, FL 32224, USA.
Jacksonville College · USMayo Clinic in Florida · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo investigate safety, response, and survival after ablative glass microsphere MATERIALS AND

methodsA retrospective review of 37 radioembolizations in 28 patients treated with single compartment dose of ≥190 Gy encompassing >75% of the largest tumor was performed. Tumors were assessed for stage, morphology, and arterial supply. Response per Modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (mRECIST), freedom from progression (FFP), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), biochemical hepatic function, performance status, and adverse events were investigated.

resultsThe median highest dose per patient was 256.8 Gy (195.7-807.8). Objective response at 3 months was 94.1% (complete 44.1% and partial 50%). Median OS was not reached and the 30-month OS rate was 59%, with a median follow-up of 13.4 months (5.4-39.4). FFP in the radiated field and overall FFP at 30 months were 67% and 40%, respectively. Favorable arterial supply was associated with improved OS (

conclusionsRadioembolization of unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma with ablative intent has a high response rate, promising survival, and is well tolerated.

Indexed as

angiographycholangiocarcinomaradiation dosimetryradioembolizationYttrium-90

Identifiers

PMID34611481
PMCPMC8487720
OpenAlexW3200977624

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.