ArticleClinical, cosmetic and investigational dentistry2021
Microleakage Evaluation in Class V Cavities Restored with Five Different Resin Composites: In vitro Dye Leakage Study.
Article in Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dentistry, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinical performance and cost-effectiveness of low-shrinkage giomer resin composite versus resin-modified glass ionomer in cervical carious lesions: a 12-month randomized controlled trial.BMC oral health · 2025Trial
- The clinical performance of monoshade resin composite as posterior restoration: a randomized controlled clinical trial.Scientific reports · 2025Trial
- Effect of photon radiotherapy on microleakage and microhardness of nanohybrid resin composite restoration: an in vitro study.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- In vitro evaluation of a novel self-adhesive composite primer modified with nano zinc oxide and hydroxyapatite: antibacterial activity, marginal microleakage, and interfacial elemental analysis.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- Article
- Newly developed universal supra-nano spherical filled resin composite in posterior teeth.Journal of conservative dentistry and endodontics · 2026Article
- Marginal microleakage at the adhesive bonding interface submitted to storage in water, chemical aging or thermocycling.European oral research · 2026Article
- Marginal and internal adaptation of different flowable composite restorations in class V cavities after thermomechanical cyclic loading: in vitro study.BMC oral health · 2025Article
- In vitro microleakage of class V restorations in human premolars prepared by Bur or Er, cr: YSGG laser using self-adhering flowable composites versus a flowable composite with self-etch adhesive.Lasers in medical science · 2025Article
- AnInternational journal of clinical pediatric dentistry · 2025Article
- Review
- Clinical Performance of Template-assisted Monochromatic Structural Colored Versus Universal Multishade Direct Composite Veneers Over 3 Years: A Randomized Clinical Trial.Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry · 2025Article
- Tooth Substrate vs Conventional Materials Used as a Base in Class V Cavities: A Comparative Study.International journal of clinical pediatric dentistry · 2025Article
- Influence of depth and translucency on the color matching of single-shade resin composites: An in vitro study.Brazilian dental journal · 2025Article
- Histological Evaluation of Polyacid-Modified Composite Resin and Conventional Composite Resin Used for Primary Molars Restoration.Dentistry journal · 2024Article
- Article
- Stamp Technique: An Explorative SEM Analysis.Dentistry journal · 2023Article
- Finite Element Analysis of Restored Principal Abutment in Free-End Saddle Partial Denture.Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dentistry · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeRestorative materials and techniques have improved the clinical success of a variety of restorative procedures. Despite these new improvements, microleakage remains one of the leading causes of restoration failure and may lead to postoperative sensitivity, enamel microcracks, marginal staining, discoloration, recurrent caries, and deformation of teeth. This study evaluated microleakages of five recent resin composites in class V cavities. MATERIALS AND
methodsStandardized class V cavities were prepared on the labial surfaces of one hundred extracted intact and noncarious human permanent premolar teeth. The cavities were divided into five groups (n=20) according to the resin composite material. Groups: A1, A2, A3, A4 and A5 were restored with Omnichroma, Spectrum, Mosaic, Tetric N-Ceram and Harmonize, respectively. The teeth were stained with methylene blue and then sectioned, and the extent of dye penetration was examined under a stereomicroscope and scanning electron microscope (SEM) to evaluate microleakage. One-way ANOVA test was used to statistically analyze the data. Statistical Package for Social Sciences Computer Software (SPSS) version 15.0 was used.
resultsDye penetration was observed at the tooth-restoration interface in all the studied samples, with varying degrees of penetration. At the cervical margins of the cavities, no statistically significant difference in the microleakage scores was observed (P=0.16). At the cavity floor, no statistically significant difference in microleakage scores was observed (P=0.74). Omnichroma resin composite had the highest microleakage results.
conclusionNanohybrid resin composites showed less microleakage than other resin composites. Among all the groups, Omnichroma showed the highest microleakage at the cavity floor and at the cervical areas. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: In light of our findings, nanohybrid resin composites appear to be capable of reducing microleakage, and the results reported herein must be verified by additional clinical trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.