Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34611365›Full record

ReviewNature protocols2021

Expression and characterization of SARS-CoV-2 spike proteins.

Jeffrey M Schaub, Chia-Wei Chou, Hung-Che Kuo, Kamyab Javanmardi, Ching-Lin Hsieh, Jory Goldsmith, Andrea M DiVenere, Kevin C Le, Daniel Wrapp, Patrick O Byrne and 10 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nature protocols, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Mammalian Antigen Display for Pandemic Countermeasures.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2024
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jeffrey M Schaub *Department of Molecular Biosciences, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA.
Chia-Wei Chou *Department of Molecular Biosciences, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9618-338X
Hung-Che Kuo *Department of Molecular Biosciences, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA.
Kamyab Javanmardi *Department of Molecular Biosciences, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA.
Ching-Lin HsiehDepartment of Molecular Biosciences, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3665-5717
Jory GoldsmithDepartment of Molecular Biosciences, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA.
Andrea M DiVenereDepartment of Chemical Engineering, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA.
Kevin C LeDepartment of Chemical Engineering, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5098-7737
Daniel WrappDepartment of Molecular Biosciences, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA.
Patrick O ByrneDepartment of Molecular Biosciences, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6462-8951
Christy K HjorthDepartment of Molecular Biosciences, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2324-8984
Nicole V JohnsonDepartment of Molecular Biosciences, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4351-125X
John Ludes-MeyersDepartment of Molecular Biosciences, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA.
Annalee W NguyenDepartment of Chemical Engineering, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1268-7164
Nianshuang WangDepartment of Molecular Biosciences, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA.
Jason J LavinderDepartment of Molecular Biosciences, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA.
Gregory C IppolitoDepartment of Molecular Biosciences, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7565-7002
Jennifer A MaynardDepartment of Chemical Engineering, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0363-8486
Jason S McLellanDepartment of Molecular Biosciences, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3991-542X
Ilya J FinkelsteinDepartment of Molecular Biosciences, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA. ilya@finkelsteinlab.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9371-2431
The University of Texas at Austin · US

Funding

Collaborative Influenza Vaccine Innovation Centers (CIVICs): Component A: Vaccine Center75N93019C00050 · NIAID · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI MOODY, TONY · 2019 to 2025
$69.1M
Ruth L. Kirschstein National Research Service Award (NRSA)- T32T32AI007392 · NIAID · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI Amy Lynn Corneli, Guido Ferrari · 1990 to 2026
$9.8M
Structure, Function and Antigenicity of Coronavirus Spike ProteinsR01AI127521 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI MCLELLAN, JASON SCOTT, WARD, ANDREW BARRETT · 2017 to 2021
$3.1M
Mechanistic Characterization of the First Steps of Human DNA Break RepairR01GM120554 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI FINKELSTEIN, ILYA J · 2016 to 2020
$1.5M
Mechanism, specificity, and design of CRISPR RNA-mediated gene regulationR01GM124141 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI FINKELSTEIN, ILYA J · 2017 to 2020
$1.2M
NCI NIH HHS HHSN261200800001ENIAID NIH HHS 75N93019C00050NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI127521NIAID NIH HHS T32 AI007392NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM120554NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM124141
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 spike protein is a critical component of coronavirus disease 2019 vaccines and diagnostics and is also a therapeutic target. However, the spike protein is difficult to produce recombinantly because it is a large trimeric class I fusion membrane protein that is metastable and heavily glycosylated. We recently developed a prefusion-stabilized spike variant, termed HexaPro for six stabilizing proline substitutions, that can be expressed with a yield of >30 mg/L in ExpiCHO cells. This protocol describes an optimized workflow for expressing and biophysically characterizing rationally engineered spike proteins in Freestyle 293 and ExpiCHO cell lines. Although we focus on HexaPro, this protocol has been used to purify over a hundred different spike variants in our laboratories. We also provide guidance on expression quality control, long-term storage, and uses in enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays. The entire protocol, from transfection to biophysical characterization, can be completed in 7 d by researchers with basic tissue cell culture and protein purification expertise.

Indexed as

SARS-CoV-2AnimalsCHO CellsCricetinaeCricetulusGene Expression Regulation, ViralHEK293 CellsHumansModels, MolecularProtein ConformationSpike Glycoprotein, CoronavirusSpike Glycoprotein, Coronavirusspike protein, SARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID34611365
PMCPMC9665560
OpenAlexW3202046790

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.