Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34611278›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2021

A prediction model using 2-propanol and 2-butanone in urine distinguishes breast cancer.

Shoko Kure, Sera Satoi, Toshihiko Kitayama, Yuta Nagase, Nobuo Nakano, Marina Yamada, Noboru Uchiyama, Satoshi Miyashita, Shinya Iida, Hiroyuki Takei and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Shoko Kure *Department of Integrated Diagnostic Pathology, Nippon Medical School, 1-1-5, Sendagi, Bunkyoku, Tokyo, 113-8602, Japan. skure@nms.ac.jp.ORCID 0000-0002-9536-9438
Sera Satoi *Department of Medicine, Mount Sinai Beth Israel, 281 First Avenue at 16th Street, New York, NY, 10003, USA.
Toshihiko KitayamaRIKEN KEIKI Co., Ltd., Minami-Sakaecho, Kasukabeshi, Saitama, 344-0057, Japan.
Yuta NagaseRIKEN KEIKI Co., Ltd., Minami-Sakaecho, Kasukabeshi, Saitama, 344-0057, Japan.
Nobuo NakanoRIKEN KEIKI Co., Ltd., Minami-Sakaecho, Kasukabeshi, Saitama, 344-0057, Japan.
Marina YamadaFaculty of Medical Science, Nippon Sport Science University, 1221-1 Kamoshida-cho, Aoba-ku, Yokohama, Kanagawa, 227-0033, Japan.
Noboru UchiyamaKoyukai Asakusa Clinic, 4-11-6, Asauksa, Taito-ku, Tokyo, 111-0032, Japan.
Satoshi MiyashitaDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Tufts Medical Center, 800 Washington Street, Boston, MA, 02111, USA.
Shinya IidaDepartment of Breast Oncology, Nippon Medical School Chiba Hokusoh Hospital, 1715 Kamagari, Inzai, Chiba, 270-1694, Japan.
Hiroyuki TakeiDepartment of Breast Surgery and Oncology, Nippon Medical School Hospital, 1-1-5, Sendagi, Bunkyoku, Tokyo, 113-8603, Japan.
Masao MiyashitaNippon Medical School, 1-1-5, Sendagi, Bunkyoku, Tokyo, 113-8602, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Safe and noninvasive methods for breast cancer screening with improved accuracy are urgently needed. Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in biological samples such as breath and blood have been investigated as noninvasive novel markers of cancer. We investigated volatile organic compounds in urine to assess their potential for the detection of breast cancer. One hundred and ten women with biopsy-proven breast cancer and 177 healthy volunteers were enrolled. The subjects were divided into two groups: a training set and an external validation set. Urine samples were collected and analyzed by gas chromatography and mass spectrometry. A predictive model was constructed by multivariate analysis, and the sensitivity and specificity of the model were confirmed using both a training set and an external set with reproducibility tests. The training set included 60 breast cancer patients (age 34-88 years, mean 60.3) and 60 healthy controls (age 34-81 years, mean 58.7). The external validation set included 50 breast cancer patients (age 35-85 years, mean 58.8) and 117 healthy controls (age 18-84 years, mean 51.2). One hundred and ninety-one compounds detected in at least 80% of the samples from the training set were used for further analysis. The predictive model that best-detected breast cancer at various clinical stages was constructed using a combination of two of the compounds, 2-propanol and 2-butanone. The sensitivity and specificity in the training set were 93.3% and 83.3%, respectively. Triplicated reproducibility tests were performed by randomly choosing ten samples from each group, and the results showed a matching rate of 100% for the breast cancer patient group and 90% for the healthy control group. Our prediction model using two VOCs is a useful complement to the current diagnostic tools. Further studies inclusive of benign tumors and non-breast malignancies are warranted.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, Tumor2-PropanolAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBreast NeoplasmsButanonesCase-Control StudiesFemaleGas Chromatography-Mass SpectrometryHumansLiquid BiopsyMiddle AgedNeoplasm GradingNeoplasm Staging2-PropanolBiomarkers, TumorButanonesmethylethyl ketoneVolatile Organic Compounds

Identifiers

PMID34611278
PMCPMC8492640

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.