ArticleScientific reports2021
Validation of a modified version of the adult developmental eye movement test.
Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Acute Effects of Caffeine on Ocular Functions in Young Adults.Turkish journal of ophthalmology · 2026Article
- Self-perceived far vision quality and night driving difficulties are not related to night myopia or visual acuity.PloS one · 2026Article
- Developmental Eye Movement (DEM) Test in Adults: Age-Related Changes and Italian Normative Data.Vision (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Performance of teenaged action video game players on the Developmental Eye Movement and King-Devick tests.PloS one · 2025Article
- Oculomotor Patterns in Children with Poor Reading Abilities Measured Using the Development Eye Movement Test.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Could driving help us to "see better"? A comparative assessment of saccadic efficiency, visual speed, and attention.BMC ophthalmology · 2024Article
- Persistence of primitive reflexes associated with asymmetries in fixation and ocular motility values.Journal of eye movement research · 2024Article
- Ocular Motility Patterns in Intellectual Disability: Insights from the Developmental Eye Movement Test.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Eye-Tracker Study of the Developmental Eye Movement Test in Young People without Binocular Dysfunctions.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Developmental Eye Movement (DEM) and King-Devick (K-D) Performance in Multiple Sclerosis.Brain sciences · 2022Article
- Correlating Ocular Physiology and Visual Function with Mild Cognitive Loss in Senior Citizens in Taiwan.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study evaluates in terms of reliability, internal consistency, and validity a modification of the Adult Developmental Eye Movement (ADEM) test, ADEM with distractors (ADEMd), designed to analyse oculomotor system, visual processing and visual attentional behaviour. 302 healthy subjects participated in the study (20-86 years old). Intrasession repeatability was evaluated by analysing the correlation between the time needed to read different parts of the test. Inter-session analyses were carried in 40 subjects by calculating intraclass correlation coefficients and using the Bland-Altman method. Validity was assessed in the outcomes obtained according to age as well as investigating the correlation between ADEMd and attentional useful field of vision (UFOV) test. Correlation coefficients between times need to read each sheet were ≥ 0.95 (p < 0.001). The inter-session intraclass correlation coefficient ranged from 0.81 in the horizontal distractor sheet to 0.97 in the vertical sheet. Bland-Altman analysis showed clinically acceptable limits of agreement. Statistically significant correlations were found between age and ADEMd outcomes (r ≥ 0.55, p < 0.001). Processing velocity, divided attention and selective attention measured with the UFOV were correlated with the horizontal distractor times (r ≥ 0.32, p < 0.001). ADEMd test may be a useful clinical tool to evaluate the combined interaction of ocular movements and visual attentional behaviour.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.