Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34611156›Full record

ArticleNature communications2021

Rewetting does not return drained fen peatlands to their old selves.

J Kreyling, F Tanneberger, F Jansen, S van der Linden, C Aggenbach, V Blüml, J Couwenberg, W-J Emsens, H Joosten, A Klimkowska and 31 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed
21.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 209 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Citizen science powers wetland restoration.Environmental science and ecotechnology · 2026
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Restoration of formerly afforested blanket bog: Estimating time for vegetation recovery.Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

41 authors at 14 institutions in 5 countries.

J KreylingUniversity of Greifswald, partner in the Greifswald Mire Centre, Greifswald, Germany. Juergen.kreyling@uni-greifswald.de.ORCID 0000-0001-8489-7289
F TannebergerUniversity of Greifswald, partner in the Greifswald Mire Centre, Greifswald, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-4184-9671
F JansenUniversity of Rostock, Rostock, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-0331-5185
S van der LindenUniversity of Greifswald, partner in the Greifswald Mire Centre, Greifswald, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-6576-8377
C AggenbachKWR Water Research Institute, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-2617-3909
V BlümlBMS-Umweltplanung in association with University of Bremen, Osnabrück, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-9910-3469
J CouwenbergUniversity of Greifswald, partner in the Greifswald Mire Centre, Greifswald, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-3922-7099
W-J EmsensUniversity of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-2667-237X
H JoostenUniversity of Greifswald, partner in the Greifswald Mire Centre, Greifswald, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-8694-5811
A KlimkowskaUniversity of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
W KotowskiUniversity of Warsaw, Faculty of Biology, Warsaw, Poland.
L KozubUniversity of Warsaw, Faculty of Biology, Warsaw, Poland.
B LennartzUniversity of Rostock, Rostock, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-3020-7312
Y LicznerUniversity of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
H LiuUniversity of Rostock, Rostock, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-2595-6012
D MichaelisUniversity of Greifswald, partner in the Greifswald Mire Centre, Greifswald, Germany.
C OehmkeUniversity of Greifswald, partner in the Greifswald Mire Centre, Greifswald, Germany.
K ParakeningsLandkreis Vorpommern-Greifswald, Anklam, Germany.
E PleylZentrum für Umwelt und Kultur Benediktbeuern e.V., Benediktbeuern, Germany.
A PoydaChristian-Albrechts-Universität Kiel, Kiel, Germany.
S RaabeUniversity of Greifswald, partner in the Greifswald Mire Centre, Greifswald, Germany.
M RöhlHochschule für Wirtschaft und Umwelt Nürtingen-Geislingen, Nürtingen-Geislingen, Germany.
K RückerChristian-Albrechts-Universität Kiel, Kiel, Germany.
A SchneiderRegional administration Havelland, Nauen, Germany.
J SchrautzerChristian-Albrechts-Universität Kiel, Kiel, Germany.
C SchröderStiftung Umwelt und Naturschutz M-V, Bugewitz, Germany.
F SchugHumboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
E SeeberUniversity of Greifswald, partner in the Greifswald Mire Centre, Greifswald, Germany.
F ThielUniversity of Greifswald, partner in the Greifswald Mire Centre, Greifswald, Germany.
S ThieleInstitut für Landschaftsökologie und Naturschutz GmbH, Greifswald, Germany.
B TiemeyerThünen-Institute of Climate-Smart Agriculture, Braunschweig, Germany.
T TimmermannUniversity of Greifswald, partner in the Greifswald Mire Centre, Greifswald, Germany.
T UrichUniversity of Greifswald, partner in the Greifswald Mire Centre, Greifswald, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-5718-1354
R van DiggelenUniversity of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-8053-945X
K VegelinBNL Vegelin; Groß Polzin, Greifswald, Germany.
E VerbruggenUniversity of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-7015-1515
M WilmkingUniversity of Greifswald, partner in the Greifswald Mire Centre, Greifswald, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-4964-2402
N Wrage-MönnigWest Pomeranian University of Technology Szczecin, Szczecin, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-3319-5655
L WołejkoUniversity of Rostock, Rostock, Germany.
D ZakLeibniz-Institute of Freshwater Ecology and Inland Fisheries, Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-1229-5294
G JurasinskiUniversity of Rostock, Rostock, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-6248-9388
Universitätsmedizin Greifswald · DEUniversity of Antwerp · BEUniversity of Rostock · DEChristian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel · DEUniversity of Warsaw · PLAarhus University · DKBUND Naturschutz · DEHumboldt-Universität zu Berlin · DEJohann Heinrich von Thünen-Institut · DEKWR Water Research Institute · NLNürtingen-Geislingen University of Applied Science · DEPhilosophisch-Theologische Hochschule Benediktbeuern · DEUniversity of Bremen · DEWest Pomeranian University of Technology in Szczecin · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Peatlands have been drained for land use for a long time and on a large scale, turning them from carbon and nutrient sinks into respective sources, diminishing water regulation capacity, causing surface height loss and destroying biodiversity. Over the last decades, drained peatlands have been rewetted for biodiversity restoration and, as it strongly decreases greenhouse gas emissions, also for climate protection. We quantify restoration success by comparing 320 rewetted fen peatland sites to 243 near-natural peatland sites of similar origin across temperate Europe, all set into perspective by 10k additional European fen vegetation plots. Results imply that rewetting of drained fen peatlands induces the establishment of tall, graminoid wetland plants (helophytisation) and long-lasting differences to pre-drainage biodiversity (vegetation), ecosystem functioning (geochemistry, hydrology), and land cover characteristics (spectral temporal metrics). The Paris Agreement entails the rewetting of 500,000 km

Indexed as

BiodiversityWaterWetlandsEnvironmental Restoration and RemediationEuropeHydrologySoilSoilWater

Identifiers

PMID34611156
PMCPMC8492760
OpenAlexW3203061994

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.