Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34611022›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2021

Interventional real-time optical imaging guidance for complete tumor ablation.

Xuefeng Kan, Feng Zhang, Guanhui Zhou, Hongxiu Ji, Wayne Monsky, Christopher Ingraham, Chuansheng Zheng, Xiaoming Yang

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Xuefeng KanImage-Guided Bio-Molecular Intervention Research and Division of Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA 98109.
Feng ZhangImage-Guided Bio-Molecular Intervention Research and Division of Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA 98109.
Guanhui ZhouImage-Guided Bio-Molecular Intervention Research and Division of Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA 98109.
Hongxiu JiImage-Guided Bio-Molecular Intervention Research and Division of Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA 98109.
Wayne MonskyImage-Guided Bio-Molecular Intervention Research and Division of Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA 98109.
Christopher IngrahamImage-Guided Bio-Molecular Intervention Research and Division of Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA 98109.
Chuansheng ZhengDepartment of Radiology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430022, China.
Xiaoming YangImage-Guided Bio-Molecular Intervention Research and Division of Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA 98109; xmyang@uw.edu.
University of Washington · USHuazhong University of Science and Technology · CNZhejiang University · CN

Funding

Development of a 3D multi-modal perfusion-thermal electrode systemR01EB028095 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI YANG, XIAOMING · 2019 to 2022
$2.4M
NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB028095
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this study was to develop an interventional optical imaging (OI) technique for intraprocedural guidance of complete tumor ablation. Our study employed four strategies: 1) optimizing experimental protocol of various indocyanine green (ICG) concentrations/detection time windows for ICG-based OI of tumor cells (ICG cells); 2) using the optimized OI to evaluate ablation-heat effect on ICG cells; 3) building the interventional OI system and investigating its sensitivity for differentiating residual viable tumors from nonviable tumors; and 4) preclinically validating its technical feasibility for intraprocedural monitoring of radiofrequency ablations (RFAs) using animal models with orthotopic hepatic tumors. OI signal-to-background ratios (SBRs) among preablation tumors, residual, and ablated tumors were statistically compared and confirmed by subsequent pathology. The optimal dose and detection time window for ICG-based OI were 100 μg/mL at 24 h. Interventional OI displayed significantly higher fluorescence signals of viable ICG cells compared with nonviable ICG cells (189.3 ± 7.6 versus 63.7 ± 5.7 au,

Indexed as

AnimalsCell Line, TumorHumansIndocyanine GreenLiverLiver NeoplasmsMargins of ExcisionModels, AnimalOptical ImagingRabbitsRadiofrequency AblationStaining and LabelingSurgery, Computer-AssistedIndocyanine Greenhepatic VX2 tumorindocyanine greeninterventional optical imagingradiofrequency ablationresidual tumor

Identifiers

PMID34611022
PMCPMC8521677
OpenAlexW3202729300

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.