Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34611018›Full record

Observational studyOpen heart2021

Combined anticoagulant and antiplatelet therapy is associated with an improved outcome in hospitalised patients with COVID-19: a propensity matched cohort study.

Kamal Matli, Nibal Chamoun, Aya Fares, Victor Zibara, Soad Al-Osta, Rabih Nasrallah, Pascale Salameh, Jacques Mokhbat, Georges Ghanem

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Open heart, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Kamal MatliCardiology, Lebanese American University Medical Center-Rizk Hospital, Beirut, Lebanon.
Nibal ChamounDepartment of Pharmacy Practice, Lebanese American University School of Pharmacy, Byblos, Lebanon.ORCID 0000-0002-0987-296X
Aya Fares *Internal Medicine, Lebanese American University Medical Center-Rizk Hospital, Beirut, Lebanon.
Victor Zibara *Lebanese American University School of Medicine, Byblos, Lebanon.
Soad Al-Osta *Lebanese American University School of Medicine, Byblos, Lebanon.
Rabih Nasrallah *Internal Medicine, Lebanese American University Medical Center-Rizk Hospital, Beirut, Lebanon.
Pascale SalamehLebanese University Faculty of Pharmacy, Hadath, Lebanon.
Jacques MokhbatInternal Medicine, Lebanese American University Medical Center-Rizk Hospital, Beirut, Lebanon.
Georges GhanemCardiology, Lebanese American University Medical Center-Rizk Hospital, Beirut, Lebanon gghanemresearch@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-0850-0689

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCOVID-19 is a respiratory disease that results in a prothrombotic state manifesting as thrombotic, microthrombotic and thromboembolic events. As a result, several antithrombotic modalities have been implicated in the treatment of this disease. This study aimed to identify if therapeutic anticoagulation (TAC) or concurrent use of antiplatelet and anticoagulants was associated with an improved outcome in this patient population.

methodsA retrospective observational cohort study of adult patients admitted to a single university hospital for COVID-19 infection was performed. The primary outcome was a composite of in-hospital mortality, intensive care unit (ICU) admission or the need for mechanical ventilation. The secondary outcomes were each of the components of the primary outcome, in-hospital mortality, ICU admission, or the need for mechanical ventilation.

results242 patients were included in the study and divided into four subgroups: Therapeutic anticoagulation (TAC), prophylactic anticoagulation+antiplatelet (PACAP), TAC+antiplatelet (TACAP) and prophylactic anticoagulation (PAC) which was the reference for comparison. Multivariable Cox regression analysis and propensity matching were done and showed when compared with PAC, TACAP and TAC were associated with less in-hospital all-cause mortality with an adjusted HR (aHR) of 0.113 (95% CI 0.028 to 0.449) and 0.126 (95% CI 0.028 to 0.528), respectively. The number needed to treat in both subgroups was 11. Furthermore, PACAP was associated with a reduced risk of invasive mechanical ventilation with an aHR of 0.07 (95% CI 0.014 to 0.351). However, the was no statistically significant difference in the occurrence of major or minor bleeds, ICU admission or the composite outcome of in-hospital mortality, ICU admission or the need for mechanical ventilation.

conclusionThe use of combined anticoagulant and antiplatelet agents or TAC alone in hospitalised patients with COVID-19 was associated with a better outcome in comparison to PAC alone without an increase in the risk of major and minor bleeds. Sufficiently powered randomised controlled trials are needed to further evaluate the safety and efficacy of combining antiplatelet and anticoagulants agents or using TAC in the management of patients with COVID-19 infection.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAnticoagulantsBlood CoagulationCOVID-19FemaleHospital MortalityHumansInpatientsIntensive Care UnitsMaleMiddle AgedPlatelet Aggregation InhibitorsRetrospective StudiesSARS-CoV-2AnticoagulantsPlatelet Aggregation InhibitorsclinicalCOVID-19microvascular anginapharmacology

Identifiers

PMID34611018
PMCPMC8493601

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.