Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34611006›Full record

ArticleSaudi medical journal2021

Impact of body weight on the outcome of pregnancy: A prospective cohort study.

Ettedal A Aljahdali

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Saudi medical journal, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Ettedal A AljahdaliFrom the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, King Abdulaziz University Hospital and from the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Bakhsh Hospital, Jeddah, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo assess the impact of body weight and body mass index (BMI) on pregnancy outcome.

methodsThis prospective cohort study included 3026 pregnant women attending Bakhsh Hospital, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia between July 2017 and June 2019. They were classified according to BMI into normal, overweight, and obese, and were followed up until delivery. The normal group was used as control. Fetal indicators (gestational age at delivery, birth weight, congenital anomalies, Apgar score at 1 and 5 minutes, and admission to neonatal intensive care unit), and maternal indicators (cesarian section, incomplete placental removal, and blood loss volume during labor) were compared between groups.

resultsPrevalence rates of diabetes mellitus and hypertension were higher among overweight and obese women than women with normal BMI (

conclusionOverweight and obese pregnant women are at high risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes and need careful periconception, antenatal, in labor, and postpartum care. We also recommend weight control.

Indexed as

PlacentaPregnancy OutcomeBody Mass IndexFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornOverweightPregnancyProspective Studiesbody mass indexfetal macrosomiapregnancy outcomeSaudi Arabia

Identifiers

PMID34611006
PMCPMC9129251

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.