Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34610831›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2021

Evaluation of United States chiropractic professional subgroups: a survey of randomly sampled chiropractors.

Jordan A Gliedt, Stephen M Perle, Aaron A Puhl, Sarah Daehler, Michael J Schneider, Joel Stevans

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Jordan A GliedtDepartment of Neurosurgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA.
Stephen M PerleUniversity of Bridgeport, College of Health Sciences, School of Chiropractic, Bridgeport, CT, USA.
Aaron A PuhlPrivate Practice, Able Body Health Clinic, Lethbridge, AB, Canada.
Sarah DaehlerDepartment of Physical Therapy, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Michael J SchneiderDepartment of Physical Therapy, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA. mjs5@pitt.edu.
Joel StevansDepartment of Physical Therapy, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
University of Pittsburgh · USHand and Upper Limb Clinic · CAMedical College of Wisconsin · USUniversity of Bridgeport · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundProfessional subgroups are common and may play a role in aiding professional maturity or impeding professional legitimization. The chiropractic profession in the United States has a long history of diverse intra-professional subgroups with varying ideologies and practice styles. To our knowledge, large-scale quantification of chiropractic professional subgroups in the United States has not been conducted. The purpose of this study was to quantify and describe the clinical practice beliefs and behaviors associated with United States chiropractic subgroups.

methodsA 10% random sample of United States licensed chiropractors (n = 8975) was selected from all 50 state regulatory board lists and invited to participate in a survey. The survey consisted of a 7-item questionnaire; 6 items were associated with chiropractic ideological and practice characteristics and 1 item was related to the self-identified role of chiropractic in the healthcare system which was utilized as the dependent variable to identify chiropractic subgroups. Multinomial logistic regression with predictive margins was used to analyze which responses to the 6 ideology and practice characteristic items were predictive of chiropractic subgroups.

resultsA total of 3538 responses were collected (39.4% response rate). Respondents self-identified into three distinct subgroups based on the perceived role of the chiropractic profession in the greater healthcare system: 56.8% were spine/neuromusculoskeletal focused; 22.0% were primary care focused; and 21.2% were vertebral subluxation focused. Patterns of responses to the 6 ideologies and practice characteristic items were substantially different across the three professional subgroups.

conclusionsRespondents self-identified into one of three distinct intra-professional subgroups. These subgroups can be differentiated along themes related to clinical practice beliefs and behaviors.

Indexed as

ChiropracticAttitude of Health PersonnelHealth PersonnelHumansSurveys and QuestionnairesUnited StatesAttitude of health personnelChiropracticHealthcare integrationHealthcare teamsInterprofessional relationsProfessional identity

Identifiers

PMID34610831
PMCPMC8491397
OpenAlexW3204562062

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.