Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34610828›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2021

Patient-public engagement strategies for health system improvement in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic scoping review.

Samuel Egyakwa Ankomah, Adam Fusheini, Christy Ballard, Emmanuel Kumah, Gagan Gurung, Sarah Derrett

Open access · goldAbstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. The Dilemmas and Opportunities of Co-Creating Health Interventions to Fit Local Contexts: An Ethnographic Study on the Adaptation of Clinical Guidelines in Tanzania.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2024
    Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Implementing patient-public engagement for improved health: Lessons from three Ghanaian community-based programmes.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2023
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Samuel Egyakwa AnkomahDepartment of Preventive and Social Medicine, University of Otago, PO Box 56, Dunedin, 9054, New Zealand.
Adam FusheiniDepartment of Preventive and Social Medicine, University of Otago, PO Box 56, Dunedin, 9054, New Zealand. adam.fusheini@otago.ac.nz.
Christy BallardHealth Sciences Library, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.
Emmanuel KumahDepartment of Health Administration and Education, University of Education, Winneba, Ghana.
Gagan GurungDepartment of General Practice and Rural Health, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.
Sarah DerrettDepartment of Preventive and Social Medicine, University of Otago, PO Box 56, Dunedin, 9054, New Zealand.
University of Otago · NZUniversity of Education, Winneba · GH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundActively involving patients and communities in health decisions can improve both peoples' health and the health system. One key strategy is Patient-Public Engagement (PPE). This scoping review aims to identify and describe PPE research in Sub-Saharan Africa; systematically map research to theories of PPE; and identify knowledge gaps to inform future research and PPE development.

methodsThe review followed guidelines for conducting and reporting scoping reviews. A systematic search of peer-reviewed English language literature published between January 1999 and December 2019 was conducted on Scopus, Medline (Ovid), CINAHL and Embase databases. Independent full text screening by three reviewers followed title and abstract screening. Using a thematic framework synthesis, eligible studies were mapped onto an engagement continuum and health system level matrix to assess the current focus of PPE in Sub-Saharan Africa.

resultsInitially 1948 articles were identified, but 18 from 10 Sub-Saharan African countries were eligible for the final synthesis. Five PPE strategies implemented were: 1) traditional leadership support, 2) community advisory boards, 3) community education and sensitisation, 4) community health volunteers/workers, and 5) embedding PPE within existing community structures. PPE initiatives were located at either the 'involvement' or 'consultation' stages of the engagement continuum, rather than higher-level engagement. Most PPE studies were at the 'service design' level of the health system or were focused on engagement in health research. No identified studies reported investigating PPE at the 'individual treatment' or 'macro policy/strategic' level.

conclusionThis review has successfully identified and evaluated key PPE strategies and their focus on improving health systems in Sub-Saharan Africa. PPE in Sub-Saharan Africa was characterised by tokenism rather than participation. PPE implementation activities are currently concentrated at the 'service design' or health research levels. Investigation of PPE at all the health system levels is required, including prioritising patient/community preferences for health system improvement.

Indexed as

Medical AssistancePatient ParticipationAfrica South of the SaharaGovernment ProgramsHumansMass ScreeningCommunity engagementHealth interventionsHealth system improvementPatient-public engagementSocial accountabilitySub-Saharan Africa

Identifiers

PMID34610828
PMCPMC8491404
OpenAlexW3204344857

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.