ArticleCell reports2021
Feature selectivity can explain mismatch signals in mouse visual cortex.
Article in Cell reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 19 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Cortical deviance detection represents a canonical difference signal.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Is the impact of spontaneous movements on early visual cortex species specific?Trends in neurosciences · 2025Review
- How Layer-Specific fMRI Can Contribute to Understanding Perceptual Disturbances Across Psychiatric Disorders.Current topics in behavioral neurosciences · 2025Review
- Flexible neural population dynamics govern the speed and stability of sensory encoding in mouse visual cortex.Nature communications · 2024Article
- Modeling circuit mechanisms of opposing cortical responses to visual flow perturbations.PLoS computational biology · 2024Article
- Synthetic surprise as the foundation of the psychedelic experience.Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews · 2024Review
- Article
- How deep is the brain? The shallow brain hypothesis.Nature reviews. Neuroscience · 2023Review
- Stimulus-Specific Prediction Error Neurons in Mouse Auditory Cortex.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2023Article
- Article
- Stimulus-specific prediction error neurons in mouse auditory cortex.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023Article
- Redefining sensorimotor mismatch selectivity in the visual cortex.Cell reports · 2023Article
- Locomotion-induced gain of visual responses cannot explain visuomotor mismatch responses in layer 2/3 of primary visual cortex.Cell reports · 2023Article
- Walking humans and running mice: perception and neural encoding of optic flow during self-motion.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023Review
- Computational components of visual predictive coding circuitry.Frontiers in neural circuits · 2023Review
- Precise movement-based predictions in the mouse auditory cortex.Current biology : CB · 2022Article
- Efficient Temporal Coding in the Early Visual System: Existing Evidence and Future Directions.Frontiers in computational neuroscience · 2022Review
- Spatial modulation of dark versus bright stimulus responses in the mouse visual system.Current biology : CB · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Sensory experience often depends on one's own actions, including self-motion. Theories of predictive coding postulate that actions are regulated by calculating prediction error, which is the difference between sensory experience and expectation based on self-generated actions. Signals consistent with prediction error have been reported in the mouse visual cortex (V1) when visual flow coupled to running was unexpectedly stopped. Here, we show that such signals can be elicited by visual stimuli uncoupled to an animal running. We record V1 neurons while presenting drifting gratings that unexpectedly stop. We find strong responses to visual perturbations, which are enhanced during running. Perturbation responses are strongest in the preferred orientation of individual neurons, and perturbation-responsive neurons are more likely to prefer slow visual speeds. Our results indicate that prediction error signals can be explained by the convergence of known motor and sensory signals, providing a purely sensory and motor explanation for purported mismatch signals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.