Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34610146›Full record

ArticleThe New phytologist2022

Drought reduces water uptake in beech from the drying topsoil, but no compensatory uptake occurs from deeper soil layers.

Arthur Gessler, Lukas Bächli, Elham Rouholahnejad Freund, Kerstin Treydte, Marcus Schaub, Matthias Haeni, Markus Weiler, Stefan Seeger, John Marshall, Christian Hug and 5 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The New phytologist, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
14.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 178 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Embolism resistance supports the contribution of dry-season precipitation to transpiration in eastern Amazon forests.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Arthur GesslerResearch Unit Forest Dynamics, Swiss Federal Research Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research WSL, 8903, Birmensdorf, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-1910-9589
Lukas BächliResearch Unit Forest Dynamics, Swiss Federal Research Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research WSL, 8903, Birmensdorf, Switzerland.
Elham Rouholahnejad FreundInstitute of Terrestrial Ecosystems, ETH Zurich, 8092, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-4316-2013
Kerstin TreydteResearch Unit Forest Dynamics, Swiss Federal Research Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research WSL, 8903, Birmensdorf, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-8399-6517
Marcus SchaubResearch Unit Forest Dynamics, Swiss Federal Research Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research WSL, 8903, Birmensdorf, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-0158-8892
Matthias HaeniResearch Unit Forest Dynamics, Swiss Federal Research Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research WSL, 8903, Birmensdorf, Switzerland.
Markus WeilerHydrology, Faculty of Environment and Natural Resources, University of Freiburg, 79098, Freiburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-6245-6917
Stefan SeegerHydrology, Faculty of Environment and Natural Resources, University of Freiburg, 79098, Freiburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-2496-6948
John MarshallDepartment of Forest Ecology and Management, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Umeå, 90283, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-3841-8942
Christian HugResearch Unit Forest Dynamics, Swiss Federal Research Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research WSL, 8903, Birmensdorf, Switzerland.
Roman ZweifelResearch Unit Forest Dynamics, Swiss Federal Research Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research WSL, 8903, Birmensdorf, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-9438-0582
Frank HagedornResearch Unit Forest Soils and Biogeochemistry, Swiss Federal Research Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research WSL, 8903, Birmensdorf, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-5218-7776
Andreas RiglingResearch Unit Forest Dynamics, Swiss Federal Research Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research WSL, 8903, Birmensdorf, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-1944-4042
Matthias SaurerResearch Unit Forest Dynamics, Swiss Federal Research Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research WSL, 8903, Birmensdorf, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-3954-3534
Katrin MeusburgerResearch Unit Forest Soils and Biogeochemistry, Swiss Federal Research Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research WSL, 8903, Birmensdorf, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-4623-6249
Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research · CHUniversity of Freiburg · DEETH Zurich · CHSwedish University of Agricultural Sciences · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The intensity and frequency of droughts events are projected to increase in future with expected adverse effects for forests. Thus, information on the dynamics of tree water uptake from different soil layers during and after drought is crucial. We applied an in situ water isotopologue monitoring system to determine the oxygen isotope composition in soil and xylem water of European beech with a 2-h resolution together with measurements of soil water content, transpiration and tree water deficit. Using a Bayesian isotope mixing model, we inferred the relative and absolute contribution of water from four different soil layers to tree water use. Beech took up more than 50% of its water from the uppermost 5 cm soil layer at the beginning of the 2018 drought, but then reduced absolute water uptake from the drying topsoil by 84%. The trees were not able to quantitatively compensate for restricted topsoil water availability by additional uptake from deeper soil layers, which is related to the fine root depth distribution. Absolute water uptake from the topsoil was restored to pre-drought levels within 3 wk after rewetting. These uptake patterns help to explain both the drought sensitivity of beech and its high recovery potential after drought release.

Indexed as

FagusBayes TheoremDroughtsSoilWaterSoilWaterBayesian isotope mixing modeldroughtdrought releaseEuropean beech (Fagus sylvatica)oxygen isotopessoil watertree water usexylem water

Identifiers

PMID34610146
PMCPMC9293437
OpenAlexW3202949053

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.