ArticleJournal of infection in developing countries2021
Does optimized adherence support improve treatment outcomes in RR / MDR-TB patients on 18-20 months regimen in Tbilisi, Georgia?
Article in Journal of infection in developing countries, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Development and validation of a LASSO-derived nomogram for predicting unfavorable treatment outcomes in drug-resistant pulmonary tuberculosis.BMC infectious diseases · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionAdherence to second-line antituberculosis drug is challenging. A combination of strategies needs to be implemented to achieve adherence. In Georgia an optimized adherence support (OAS) - a package of education, psychosocial support and adherence counselling - was added to the already existing package of adherence support (supervised treatment, adherence incentives, transport cost reimbursement) to improve adherence and increase treatment success. We assessed the additive benefits of OAS on adherence and treatment outcomes. METHODOLOGY: This was a before and after cohort study using routine programme data in the National Center for Tuberculosis and Lung Diseases in Tbilisi. All adult rifampicin- and multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (RR/MDR-TB) patients enrolled for treatment under directly observed therapy in the NCTLD during the period before (June 2015 - January 2016) and after (June 2017 - January 2018) were included in the study. Primary outcomes were: i) adequate adherence defined as ≥ 85% of days covered by TB medication during the whole treatment period; ii) final treatment outcomes.
resultsOf 221 RR/MDR-TB, most patients were male (76%, N = 167) with a mean age of 41 ± 14 years. Adherence data was available for 111 patients in the 'before' and 97 patients in the 'after' cohort. Adequate adherence was achieved by 62% (69/111) in the 'before' and 70% (68/97) in the 'after' cohort (p = 0.290). Overall treatment success was 64% (73/114) and 63% (67/107) in the 'before' and 'after' cohorts respectively (p = 0.937).
conclusionsImplementation of OAS had modest effect on adherence and had no additive benefits on treatment outcomes among RR/MDR-TB patients on 18-20 months regimen.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.