Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34609733›Full record

ArticlePerspectives on medical education2021

Theory in quality improvement and patient safety education: A scoping review.

Joanne Goldman, Andrea Smeraglio, Lisha Lo, Ayelet Kuper, Brian M Wong

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Perspectives on medical education, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Effects of an Experiential Learning Curriculum on Systems-Thinking.Journal of medical education and curricular development
    Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Joanne GoldmanCentre for Quality Improvement and Patient Safety, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. joanne.goldman@utoronto.ca.ORCID 0000-0003-1589-4070
Andrea SmeraglioDepartment of Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0775-7930
Lisha LoCentre for Quality Improvement and Patient Safety, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Ayelet KuperThe Wilson Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-6399-6958
Brian M WongCentre for Quality Improvement and Patient Safety, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-8012-799X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionTheory plays an important role in education programming and research. However, its use in quality improvement and patient safety education has yet to be fully characterized. The authors undertook a scoping review to examine the use of theory in quality improvement and patient safety education.

methodsEligible articles used theory to inform the design or study of a quality improvement or patient safety curriculum. The authors followed scoping review methodology and searched articles referenced in 20 systematic reviews of quality improvement and patient safety education, or articles citing one of these reviews, and hand searched eligible article references. Data analysis involved descriptive and interpretive summaries of theories used and the perspectives the theories offered.

resultsEligibility criteria were met by 28 articles, and 102 articles made superficial mention of theory. Eligible articles varied in professional group, learning stage and journal type. Theories fell into two broad categories: learning theories (n = 20) and social science theories (n = 11). Theory was used in the design (n = 12) or study (n = 17) of quality improvement and patient safety education. The range of theories shows the opportunity afforded by using more than one type of theory. DISCUSSION: Theory can guide decisions regarding quality improvement and patient safety education practices or play a role in selecting a methodology or lens through which to study educational processes and outcomes. Educators and researchers should make deliberate choices around the use of theory that relates to aspects of an educational program that they seek to illuminate.

Indexed as

Patient SafetyQuality ImprovementCurriculumHumansLearningEducationPatient safetyQuality improvementScoping reviewTheory

Identifiers

PMID34609733
PMCPMC8633332

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.