Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34609676›Full record

ArticleJournal of bioethical inquiry2021

Ecologies of Public Trust: The NHS COVID-19 Contact Tracing App.

Gabrielle Samuel, Frederica Lucivero, Stephanie Johnson, Heilien Diedericks

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of bioethical inquiry, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Patients might distrust honest doctors.Journal of hospital medicine · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Australian Attitudes Towards Waivers of Consent Within the Context of Genomic Data Sharing.Journal of empirical research on human research ethics : JERHRE · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. A Lost Idyll of Connection?Journal of bioethical inquiry · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Gabrielle Samuel *Department of Global Health and Social Medicine, King's College London, Bush House, Strand, London, UK. gabbysamuel@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8111-2730
Frederica Lucivero *Ethox Centre and Wellcome Centre for Ethics and Humanities, Oxford University, Oxford, UK.
Stephanie Johnson *Ethox Centre and Wellcome Centre for Ethics and Humanities, Oxford University, Oxford, UK.
Heilien Diedericks *Department of Global Health and Social Medicine, King's College London, Bush House, Strand, London, UK.

Funding

Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 203132Wellcome Trust 213619/Z/18/Z/Wellcome Trust 221038_Z_20_Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In April 2020, close to the start of the first U.K. COVID-19 lockdown, the U.K. government announced the development of a COVID-19 contact tracing app, which was later trialled on the U.K. island, the Isle of Wight, in May/June 2020. United Kingdom surveys found general support for the development of such an app, which seemed strongly influenced by public trust. Institutions developing the app were called upon to fulfil the commitment to public trust by acting with trustworthiness. Such calls presuppose that public trust associated with the app can emerge if the conditions for trustworthiness are met and that public trust is simplistic, i.e., linearly the sum of each member of the publics' individual - U.K. government trust relationship. Drawing on a synthesis of the trust literature and fifteen interviews with members of the public trialling the app on the Isle of Wight, this paper aims to explore what trust mechanisms and relationships are at play when thinking about public trust in the context of the U.K. COVID-19 app. We argue that public trust is a complex social phenomenon and not linearly correlated with institutional trustworthiness. As such, attention needs to widen from calls for trustworthy infrastructures as a way to build public trust, to a deeper understanding of those doing the trusting; in particular, what or whom do people place their trust in (or not) when considering whether using the app and why. An understanding of this will help when trying to secure public trust during the implementation of necessary public health measures.

Indexed as

COVID-19Mobile ApplicationsCommunicable Disease ControlContact TracingHumansSARS-CoV-2State MedicineTrustContact tracing appDigital healthEthicsTrustTrustworthiness

Identifiers

PMID34609676
PMCPMC8490841

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.