Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34609617›Full record

ArticleEuropean spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society2021

Assessing clinical trunk change with surface topography: anterior scoliosis correction as a model to evaluate curve progression.

Alekhya Madiraju, Patrick J Mulcahey, Patrick T Knott, Allison R Haas, Laury A Cuddihy, M Darryl Antonacci, Randal R Betz

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Alekhya Madiraju *The Institute for Spine and Scoliosis, 3100 Princeton Pike Bldg. 1-D, Lawrenceville, NJ, 08648, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4434-0990
Patrick J Mulcahey *The Institute for Spine and Scoliosis, 3100 Princeton Pike Bldg. 1-D, Lawrenceville, NJ, 08648, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3290-6769
Patrick T KnottRosalind Franklin University of Medicine and Science, 3333 Green Bay Road, North Chicago, IL, 60064, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7225-3053
Allison R HaasThe Institute for Spine and Scoliosis, 3100 Princeton Pike Bldg. 1-D, Lawrenceville, NJ, 08648, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5654-6243
Laury A CuddihyThe Institute for Spine and Scoliosis, 3100 Princeton Pike Bldg. 1-D, Lawrenceville, NJ, 08648, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8042-2929
M Darryl AntonacciThe Institute for Spine and Scoliosis, 3100 Princeton Pike Bldg. 1-D, Lawrenceville, NJ, 08648, USA.
Randal R BetzThe Institute for Spine and Scoliosis, 3100 Princeton Pike Bldg. 1-D, Lawrenceville, NJ, 08648, USA. randalrbetz@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0003-2368-9966

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposePrevious work has suggested that surface topography can be used for repeated measurements of deformity during curve monitoring following an initial radiograph. Changes in deformity during natural curve progression may be subtle. An important preemptive question to answer is whether topography can follow a large change in spine deformity, as in scoliosis correction. We assess the ability of surface topography to track the evolution of spine deformity during anterior scoliosis correction relative to traditional radiographs. Anterior scoliosis correction was chosen for this analysis because it changes the shape of the trunk without leaving a surgical scar and muscle atrophy along the posterior spine.

methodsFollowing IRB approval, 18 patients aged 14.6 ± 2.0 years at surgery were enrolled in a retrospective review of coronal radiographs and topographic scans acquired before and after scoliosis correction. Radiographic and topographic measures for the coronal curve angle before and after surgery were compared.

resultsSurface topography estimates correlate with radiographic measures of the pre- (r = 0.7890, CI = [0.4989 0.9201], p < 0.00001), postsurgical (r = 0.7485, CI = [0.4329 0.9006], p = 0.0004), and the change in the coronal curve angle (r = 0.6744, CI = [0.3028 0.8680], p = 0.0021) due to surgery.

conclusionsWe provide evidence open for further extension that topography can follow changes in the coronal curve angle comparably to radiographs. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV.

Indexed as

ScoliosisSpinal FusionHumansRetrospective StudiesThoracic VertebraeTreatment OutcomeAnterior scoliosis correctionCurve surveillanceScoliosisSurface topography

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.