Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34609524›Full record

ReviewApplied microbiology and biotechnology2021

Polymers for enhanced oil recovery: fundamentals and selection criteria revisited.

Sugandha Mahajan, Harender Yadav, Sandeep Rellegadla, Akhil Agrawal

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Applied microbiology and biotechnology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sugandha MahajanDepartment of Microbiology, Central University of Rajasthan, Bandarsindri Kishangarh, NH-8, Ajmer, Rajasthan, India.
Harender Yadav *Department of Microbiology, Central University of Rajasthan, Bandarsindri Kishangarh, NH-8, Ajmer, Rajasthan, India.
Sandeep Rellegadla *Department of Microbiology, Central University of Rajasthan, Bandarsindri Kishangarh, NH-8, Ajmer, Rajasthan, India.
Akhil AgrawalDepartment of Microbiology, Central University of Rajasthan, Bandarsindri Kishangarh, NH-8, Ajmer, Rajasthan, India. akhilagrawal@curaj.ac.in.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7556-7285
Central University of Rajasthan · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As the energy demand is escalating tremendously and crude oil being the primary energy source for at least the next two decades, the production of crude oil should be enhanced to meet the global energy needs. This can be achieved by either exploration of new oil fields for crude oil extraction or employing enhanced oil recovery (EOR) technology to recover the residual oil from existing marginal oil fields. The former method requires more capital investment and time; therefore, this review focuses on the latter. In general, the abandoned oil fields still have 50% of crude left which is unrecovered due to lack of technology. Hence, EOR came into existence after the conventional methods of recovery (primary and secondary recovery) were found to be inefficient and less economical. Nineteen percent of the EOR projects are based upon cEOR methods worldwide, of which more than 80% of projects use economically feasible polymer flooding process for oil recovery. Both synthetic and naturally derived polymers have been used widely for this purpose; however, many recent studies have shown the lower stability of synthetic polymers under extreme reservoir conditions of high salinity and temperature. Additionally, naturally derived polymers face microbial degradation as the major limitation. Therefore, a number of novel polymers are currently studied for their suitability as an efficient EOR polymer. Latest findings have also revealed that biopolymers play an important role in wettability alteration, pore evolution by bioplugging, and reducing fingering effect. Injection of biopolymers can also lead to the selective plugging of thief zones which redirects water flood to the inaccessible oil pores. Therefore, the current study focuses on such principle and mechanism of polymer flooding along with the reservoir and field characteristics which affects the polymer flooding. It also discusses the scope of biopolymer along with the screening criteria for use of novel polymers and strategies to overcome the problems during polymer flooding. KEY POINTS: • Discussion of macroscopic and microscopic mechanisms of polymer flooding. • Screening criteria of polymers prior to flooding are essential. • Biopolymers are eco-friendly and are applicable for a wide range of reservoir conditions.

Indexed as

PetroleumPolymersBiopolymersOil and Gas FieldsPatient SelectionBiopolymersPetroleumPolymersBiopolymerEnhanced oil recoveryPermeabilityPolymer flooding mechanismViscoelasticity

Identifiers

PMID34609524
OpenAlexW3201697790

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.