Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34609452›Full record

Trial reportJAMA2021

Effect of Prophylactic Subcutaneous Scopolamine Butylbromide on Death Rattle in Patients at the End of Life: The SILENCE Randomized Clinical Trial.

Harriëtte J van Esch, Lia van Zuylen, Eric C T Geijteman, Esther Oomen-de Hoop, Bregje A A Huisman, Heike S Noordzij-Nooteboom, Renske Boogaard, Agnes van der Heide, Carin C D van der Rijt

Abstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Reducing death rattle at the end of life.Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Harriëtte J van EschDepartment of Medical Oncology, Erasmus Medical Center Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Lia van ZuylenDepartment of Medical Oncology, Erasmus Medical Center Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Eric C T GeijtemanDepartment of Medical Oncology, Erasmus Medical Center Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Esther Oomen-de HoopDepartment of Medical Oncology, Erasmus Medical Center Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Bregje A A HuismanHospice Kuria, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Heike S Noordzij-NooteboomHospice Calando, Dirksland, the Netherlands.
Renske BoogaardPalliative Care Unit "de Regenboog," Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Agnes van der HeideDepartment of Public Health, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Carin C D van der RijtDepartment of Medical Oncology, Erasmus Medical Center Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Death rattle, defined as noisy breathing caused by the presence of mucus in the respiratory tract, is relatively common among dying patients. Although clinical guidelines recommend anticholinergic drugs to reduce the death rattle after nonpharmacological measures fail, evidence regarding their efficacy is lacking. Given that anticholinergics only decrease mucus production, it is unknown whether prophylactic application may be more appropriate. Objective: To determine whether administration of prophylactic scopolamine butylbromide reduces the death rattle. Design, Setting, and Participants: A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial was performed in 6 hospices in the Netherlands. Patients with a life expectancy of 3 or more days who were admitted to the participating hospices were asked to give advance informed consent from April 10, 2017, through December 31, 2019. When the dying phase was recognized, patients fulfilling the eligibility criteria were randomized. Of the 229 patients who provided advance informed consent, 162 were ultimately randomized. The date of final follow-up was January 31, 2020. Interventions: Administration of subcutaneous scopolamine butylbromide, 20 mg four times a day (n = 79), or placebo (n = 78). Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was the occurrence of a grade 2 or higher death rattle as defined by Back (range, 0-3; 0, no rattle; 3, rattle audible standing in the door opening) measured at 2 consecutive time points with a 4-hour interval. Secondary outcomes included the time between recognizing the dying phase and the onset of a death rattle and anticholinergic adverse events. Results: Among 162 patients who were randomized, 157 patients (97%; median age, 76 years [IQR, 66-84 years]; 56% women) were included in the primary analyses. A death rattle occurred in 10 patients (13%) in the scopolamine group compared with 21 patients (27%) in the placebo group (difference, 14%; 95% CI, 2%-27%, P = .02). Regarding secondary outcomes, an analysis of the time to death rattle yielded a subdistribution hazard ratio (HR) of 0.44 (95% CI, 0.20-0.92; P = .03; cumulative incidence at 48 hours: 8% in the scopolamine group vs 17% in the placebo group). In the scopolamine vs placebo groups, restlessness occurred in 22 of 79 patients (28%) vs 18 of 78 (23%), dry mouth in 8 of 79 (10%) vs 12 of 78 (15%), and urinary retention in 6 of 26 (23%) vs 3 of 18 (17%), respectively. Conclusions and Relevance: Among patients near the end of life, prophylactic subcutaneous scopolamine butylbromide, compared with placebo, significantly reduced the occurrence of the death rattle. Trial Registration: trialregister.nl Identifier: NTR6264.

Indexed as

DeathAgedAged, 80 and overButylscopolammonium BromideCholinergic AntagonistsConfidence IntervalsDouble-Blind MethodDrug Administration ScheduleFemaleHospice CareHumansIncidenceInformed ConsentInjections, SubcutaneousLife ExpectancyMaleButylscopolammonium BromideCholinergic AntagonistsPlacebos

Identifiers

PMID34609452
PMCPMC8493437

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.