ArticleRomanian journal of morphology and embryology = Revue roumaine de morphologie et embryologie
Inflammatory status of the pancreas in NOD mice that do not develop overt diabetes.
Article in Romanian journal of morphology and embryology = Revue roumaine de morphologie et embryologie. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Combined Exendin-4 and Rituximab Treatment Improves β-Cell Function and Delays Disease Progression in NOD Mice.Biology · 2026Article
- Revisiting type 1 diabetes progression in the non-obese diabetic mouse.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Article
- A novel subpopulation of monocytes with a strong interferon signature indicated by SIGLEC-1 is present in patients with in recent-onset type 1 diabetes.Diabetologia · 2024Article
- Modern aspects of the management of pancreatic intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms: a narrative review.Romanian journal of morphology and embryology = Revue roumaine de morphologie et embryologieReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Type 1 diabetes (T1D) is an autoimmune disease in which immune cells target the pancreatic islets and destroy the β-cells, resulting in hyperglycemia and decreased plasmatic insulin levels. The non-obese diabetic (NOD) mouse is the most used animal model for studying diabetes because it spontaneously develops T1D and shares similarities with the human disease. A hallmark feature of this model is the appearance of insulitis, defined as an inflammatory cell infiltration of the pancreatic islets. However, a small percentage of NOD mice do not develop overt diabetes even after 28-35 weeks of age. Thus, we questioned the status of the pancreatic islets in these non-diabetic NOD mice, with particular focus on islet inflammation and plasmatic insulin levels, in comparison to pre-diabetic (11 weeks old) and new-onset diabetic mice. Diabetes progression was evaluated by assessing blood glucose and pancreas histology. The inflammatory score was determined on Hematoxylin-Eosin (HE)-stained sections of pancreas. Plasma insulin was detected by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). The results showed that inflammation increased in an age-dependent manner in all mice, irrespective of their diabetic status. Mostly affected within the analyzed groups were the 28 weeks old non-diabetic NOD mice, in which insulin production was reduced and inversely correlated with the inflammatory status. We conclude that in NOD mice, pancreatic inflammation progresses independently of diabetes onset and clinical signs of disease. Most likely, the NOD females that do not develop overt diabetes preserve a small mass of functional β-cells, which is able to provide the physiological insulin levels and avoid diabetes onset.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.