ArticleRomanian journal of morphology and embryology = Revue roumaine de morphologie et embryologie
Assessment of the aortic wall histological changes with ageing.
Article in Romanian journal of morphology and embryology = Revue roumaine de morphologie et embryologie. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Involvement of Herpesviruses in the Pathogenesis of Thoracic Aortic Aneurysms: Passive Bystanders or Active Contributors?Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Review
- Aging related decreases in NM myosin expression and contractility in a resistance vessel.Frontiers in physiology · 2024Article
- Ascending Aorta Diameter Changes after Aortic Valve Replacement in Elderly Patients with Aortic Valve Stenosis.Cardiology research and practice · 2022Article
- Remodeling of the aortic wall layers with ageing.Romanian journal of morphology and embryology = Revue roumaine de morphologie et embryologieArticle
- Assessment of the aortic tunica media histological changes in relation with the cause of death.Romanian journal of morphology and embryology = Revue roumaine de morphologie et embryologieArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimThe authors aimed to quantitatively assess the variation with age of three of the main components of the aortic wall, namely elastic fibers (FE) and collagen fibers [FC(COL)], and smooth muscle cells (SMCs). MATERIALS AND
methodsFour aortic cross sections (base, cross, thoracic, abdominal) were collected during autopsy from 90 cases of all ages, processed using the classical histopathological (HP) technique (formalin fixation and paraffin embedding) and stained with Orcein and Goldner's trichrome. The obtained histological slides were transformed into virtual slides. Quantitative measurements of the three components were made on identical regions of interest (ROIs) selected from two-paired slides stained with the above-mentioned techniques using custom-made software, developed in MATLAB (MathWorks, USA). RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS: FE revealed an obvious decreasing general trend with age, present at all four levels of investigation. Smooth muscle fibers (FM) density showed almost no variation with age regardless of the level at which the measurement was made. FC(COL) density had an obvious increasing trend with age, expressed in all four aortic regions FE densities and FM densities were higher in men than in women, while FC(COL) densities were higher in women than in men in three of the aortic regions excepting, in all cases, the cross region.
conclusionsThere were differences between men and women concerning the composition of aortic wall cellular and extracellular compartments. FE and FC(COL) dominated the age-related remodeling process of the aortic wall. The process evolved in the same way in all regions of the aorta. Studies need to be continued to define more clearly this complex process of vascular wall remodeling with aging.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.