Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34609073›Full record

ArticleJournal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle2021

Gut microbiota and short-chain fatty acid alterations in cachectic cancer patients.

Jorne Ubachs, Janine Ziemons, Zita Soons, Romy Aarnoutse, David P J van Dijk, John Penders, Ardy van Helvoort, Marjolein L Smidt, Roy F P M Kruitwagen, Lieke Baade-Corpelijn and 2 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07653698 (Evaluation of Cancer Cachexia and Analysis of Gut Microbiota in Patients With Breast Cancer Receiving Home Care), which is not on this map. Cited by 106 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
106citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
11.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07653698 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Evaluation of Cancer Cachexia and Analysis of Gut Microbiota in Patients With Breast Cancer Receiving Home Care

TypeinterventionalSponsorFondazione ANT Franco Pannuti ETSRan2026 to 2028Enrolled140ConditionsBreast Cancer, Cancer CachexiaArmsProbiotic Mixture, Placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

106 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 147 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. [Fecal Microbiota Transplantation: A Promising Avenue for Lung Cancer Therapy].Zhongguo fei ai za zhi = Chinese journal of lung cancer · 2025
    Pooled it
  3. Guideline
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. The Role of Gut Microbiota in Acute Myeloid Leukemia.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Cancer cachexia: molecular basis and therapeutic advances.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2026
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Omics Approaches to Unraveling the Complexity of the Gut-Lung Axis.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2026
    Review

46 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 1 institution in 3 countries.

Jorne UbachsGROW-School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-9498-6162
Janine ZiemonsGROW-School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Zita SoonsDepartment of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Romy AarnoutseGROW-School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
David P J van DijkDepartment of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
John PendersNUTRIM-School of Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Ardy van HelvoortNUTRIM-School of Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Marjolein L SmidtGROW-School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Roy F P M KruitwagenGROW-School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Lieke Baade-CorpelijnDepartment of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Steven W M Olde DaminkDepartment of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Sander S RensenDepartment of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Maastricht University Medical Centre · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCancer cachexia is characterized by a negative energy balance, muscle and adipose tissue wasting, insulin resistance, and systemic inflammation. Because of its strong negative impact on prognosis and its multifactorial nature that is still not fully understood, cachexia remains an important challenge in the field of cancer treatment. Recent animal studies indicate that the gut microbiota is involved in the pathogenesis and manifestation of cancer cachexia, but human data are lacking. The present study investigates gut microbiota composition, short-chain fatty acids (SCFA), and inflammatory parameters in human cancer cachexia.

methodsFaecal samples were prospectively collected in patients (N = 107) with pancreatic cancer, lung cancer, breast cancer, or ovarian cancer. Household partners (N = 76) of the patients were included as healthy controls with similar diet and environmental conditions. Patients were classified as cachectic if they lost >5% body weight in the last 6 months. Gut microbiota composition was analysed by sequencing of the 16S rRNA V4 gene region. Faecal SCFA levels were quantified by gas chromatography. Faecal calprotectin was assessed with enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Serum C-reactive protein and leucocyte counts were retrieved from medical records.

resultsCachexia prevalence was highest in pancreatic cancer (66.7%), followed by ovarian cancer (25%), lung cancer (20.8%), and breast cancer (17.3%). Microbial α-diversity was not significantly different between cachectic cancer patients (N = 33), non-cachectic cancer patients (N = 74), or healthy controls (N = 76) (species richness P = 0.31; Shannon effective index P = 0.46). Community structure (β-diversity) tended to differ between these groups (P = 0.053), although overall differences were subtle and no clear clustering of samples was observed. Proteobacteria (P < 0.001), an unknown genus from the Enterobacteriaceae family (P < 0.01), and Veillonella (P < 0.001) were more abundant among cachectic cancer patients. Megamonas (P < 0.05) and Peptococcus (P < 0.001) also showed differential abundance. Faecal levels of all SCFA tended to be lower in cachectic cancer patients, but only acetate concentrations were significantly reduced (P < 0.05). Faecal calprotectin levels were positively correlated with the abundance of Peptococcus, unknown Enterobacteriaceae, and Veillonella. We also identified several correlations and interactions between clinical and microbial parameters.

conclusionsThis clinical study provided the first insights into the alterations of gut microbiota composition and SCFA levels that occur in cachectic cancer patients and how they are related to inflammatory parameters. These results pave the way for further research examining the role of the gut microbiota in cancer cachexia and its potential use as therapeutic target.

Indexed as

Gastrointestinal MicrobiomePancreatic NeoplasmsAnimalsCachexiaFatty Acids, VolatileHumansRNA, Ribosomal, 16SFatty Acids, VolatileRNA, Ribosomal, 16SBreast cancerCachexiaInflammationLung cancerPancreatic cancerWeight loss

Identifiers

PMID34609073
PMCPMC8718054
OpenAlexW3203735260

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.