Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34609038›Full record

ArticleHuman brain mapping2022

Striatal networks for tinnitus treatment targeting.

Leighton B N Hinkley, Paul S Larson, Jennifer Henderson Sabes, Danielle Mizuiri, Carly Demopoulos, Meredith E Adams, Thomas C Neylan, Christopher P Hess, Srikantan S Nagarajan, Steven W Cheung

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human brain mapping, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06821893 (Vagus Auricular Stimulation for Tinnitus), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06821893 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Vagus Auricular Stimulation for Tinnitus

TypeinterventionalSponsorWashington University School of MedicineRan2025 to 2025Enrolled40ConditionsTinnitusArmsVibrational stimulation, Sham
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Focal tDCS of auditory cortex in chronic tinnitus: A randomized controlled mechanistic trial.Clinical neurophysiology : official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2024
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. [Progress in neural network mechanism of tinnitus using functional magnetic resonance imaging].Lin chuang er bi yan hou tou jing wai ke za zhi = Journal of clinical otorhinolaryngology head and neck surgery · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Leighton B N HinkleyDepartment of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7024-3532
Paul S LarsonDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA.
Jennifer Henderson SabesDepartment of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA.
Danielle MizuiriDepartment of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA.
Carly DemopoulosDepartment of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2082-3947
Meredith E AdamsDepartment of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
Thomas C NeylanDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA.
Christopher P HessDepartment of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA.
Srikantan S NagarajanDepartment of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7209-3857
Steven W CheungDepartment of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1724-4944
University of California, San Francisco · USUniversity of Minnesota Medical Center · US

Funding

Neural mechanisms of speech motor control in Autism Spectrum DisordersR01DC019167 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI DEMOPOULOS, CARLY, LI, YAN · 2021 to 2025
$4.2M
Pilot Clinical Trial of Deep Brain Stimulation for TinnitusU01DC013029 · NIDCD · NORTHERN CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE/RES/EDU · PI CHEUNG, STEVEN WAN, LARSON, PAUL · 2013 to 2017
$3.4M
Vocal sensorimotor control and voice abnormalities in Autism Spectrum DisordersK23DC016637 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI DEMOPOULOS, CARLY · 2018 to 2022
$1.0M
FDA HHS IDE G120132NIDCD NIH HHS K23 DC016637NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC019167NIDCD NIH HHS U01 DC013029NIDCD NIH HHS U01DC013029
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neuromodulation treatment effect size for bothersome tinnitus may be larger and more predictable by adopting a target selection approach guided by personalized striatal networks or functional connectivity maps. Several corticostriatal mechanisms are likely to play a role in tinnitus, including the dorsal/ventral striatum and the putamen. We examined whether significant tinnitus treatment response by deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the caudate nucleus may be related to striatal network increased functional connectivity with tinnitus networks that involve the auditory cortex or ventral cerebellum. The first study was a cross-sectional 2-by-2 factorial design (tinnitus, no tinnitus; hearing loss, normal hearing, n = 68) to define cohort level abnormal functional connectivity maps using high-field 7.0 T resting-state fMRI. The second study was a pilot case-control series (n = 2) to examine whether tinnitus modulation response to caudate tail subdivision stimulation would be contingent on individual level striatal connectivity map relationships with tinnitus networks. Resting-state fMRI identified five caudate subdivisions with abnormal cohort level functional connectivity maps. Of those, two connectivity maps exhibited increased connectivity with tinnitus networks-dorsal caudate head with Heschl's gyrus and caudate tail with the ventral cerebellum. DBS of the caudate tail in the case-series responder resulted in dramatic reductions in tinnitus severity and loudness, in contrast to the nonresponder who showed no tinnitus modulation. The individual level connectivity map of the responder was in alignment with the cohort expectation connectivity map, where the caudate tail exhibited increased connectivity with tinnitus networks, whereas the nonresponder individual level connectivity map did not.

Indexed as

ConnectomeDeep Brain StimulationAdultAgedAuditory CortexCase-Control StudiesCaudate NucleusCerebellumCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHearing LossHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedNerve Netcaudate nucleushearing lossneuromodulationstriatal networkstinnitus

Identifiers

PMID34609038
PMCPMC8720198
OpenAlexW3203642959

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.