Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34608999›Full record

ArticleHealth services research2022

Development of a homelessness risk screening tool for emergency department patients.

Kelly M Doran, Eileen Johns, Sara Zuiderveen, Marybeth Shinn, Kinsey Dinan, Maryanne Schretzman, Lillian Gelberg, Dennis Culhane, Donna Shelley, Tod Mijanovich

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health services research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in the Emergency Department: A Scoping Review.Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Physician explanation of Z-coded homelessness in medicaid claims.Health services & outcomes research methodology · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Eligibility of emergency department patients for public benefit programs.Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 8 institutions in 2 countries.

Kelly M DoranDepartment of Emergency Medicine, NYU School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8961-3724
Eileen JohnsNYC Center for Innovation through Data Intelligence, New York, New York, USA.
Sara ZuiderveenPrevention and Housing Support, Homelessness Prevention Administration, NYC Human Resources Administration, New York, New York, USA.
Marybeth ShinnDepartment of Human and Organizational Development, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
Kinsey DinanOffice of Research and Policy Innovation, NYC Department of Social Services, New York, New York, USA.
Maryanne SchretzmanNYC Center for Innovation through Data Intelligence, New York, New York, USA.
Lillian GelbergDepartment of Family Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Dennis CulhaneSchool of Social Policy and Practice, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Donna ShelleyPublic Health Policy and Management, NYU School of Global Public Health, New York, New York, USA.
Tod MijanovichApplied Statistics and Health Policy, Department of Applied Statistics, Social Science, and Humanities, NYU Steinhardt School, New York, New York, USA.
Center for Innovation · USNew York University · USDepartment of Administration · GUPublic Health Solutions · USSocial Sciences Innovations · USUniversity of California, Los Angeles · USUniversity of Pennsylvania · USVanderbilt University · US

Funding

Addressing Homelessness and Substance Use in Emergency Department PatientsK23DA039179 · NIDA · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI DORAN, KELLY · 2016 to 2020
$989k
NIDA NIH HHS K23 DA039179
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo develop a screening tool to identify emergency department (ED) patients at risk of entering a homeless shelter, which could inform targeting of interventions to prevent future homelessness episodes. DATA SOURCES: Linked data from (1) ED patient baseline questionnaires and (2) citywide administrative homeless shelter database. STUDY

designStakeholder-informed predictive modeling utilizing ED patient questionnaires linked with prospective shelter administrative data. The outcome was shelter entry documented in administrative data within 6 months following the baseline ED visit. Exposures were responses to questions on homelessness risk factors from baseline questionnaires. DATA COLLECTION/EXTRACTION

methodsResearch assistants completed questionnaires with randomly sampled ED patients who were medically stable, not in police/prison custody, and spoke English or Spanish. Questionnaires were linked to administrative data using deterministic and probabilistic matching. PRINCIPAL

findingsOf 1993 ED patients who were not homeless at baseline, 5.6% entered a shelter in the next 6 months. A screening tool consisting of two measures of past shelter use and one of past criminal justice involvement had 83.0% sensitivity and 20.4% positive predictive value for future shelter entry.

conclusionsOur study demonstrates the potential of using cross-sector data to improve hospital initiatives to address patients' social needs.

Indexed as

Ill-Housed PersonsEmergency Service, HospitalHousingHumansProspective StudiesSurveys and Questionnairesdelivery of health careemergency servicehomeless personshospitalhousingsocial problems

Identifiers

PMID34608999
PMCPMC8928028
OpenAlexW3204370137

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.