Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34608769›Full record

Trial reportCPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology2021

Elevated acute phase proteins affect pharmacokinetics in COVID-19 trials: Lessons from the CounterCOVID - imatinib study.

Imke H Bartelink, Pierre M Bet, Nicolas Widmer, Monia Guidi, Erik Duijvelaar, Bram Grob, Richard Honeywell, Amanda Evelo, Ivo P E Tielbeek, Sue D Snape and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Imke H BartelinkDepartment of Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacy, Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Pierre M BetDepartment of Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacy, Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Nicolas WidmerService of Clinical Pharmacology, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Monia GuidiService of Clinical Pharmacology, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Erik DuijvelaarDepartment of Pulmonary Medicine, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Bram GrobDepartment of Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacy, Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Richard HoneywellDepartment of Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacy, Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Amanda EveloDepartment of Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacy, Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Ivo P E TielbeekDepartment of Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacy, Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Sue D SnapeExvastat Ltd., Cambridge, UK.
Henrike HamerDepartment of Clinical Chemistry, Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Laurent A DecosterdService of Clinical Pharmacology, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Harm Jan BogaardDepartment of Pulmonary Medicine, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Jurjan AmanDepartment of Pulmonary Medicine, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Eleonora L SwartDepartment of Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacy, Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Amsterdam University Medical Centers · NLUniversity of Lausanne · CH

Funding

Innovative Medicines Initiative 2 Joint Undertaking 101005142
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aimed to determine whether published pharmacokinetic (PK) models can adequately predict the PK profile of imatinib in a new indication, such as coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Total (bound + unbound) and unbound imatinib plasma concentrations obtained from 134 patients with COVID-19 participating in the CounterCovid study and from an historical dataset of 20 patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) and 85 patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) were compared. Total imatinib area under the concentration time curve (AUC), maximum concentration (C

Indexed as

COVID-19 Drug TreatmentAcute-Phase ProteinsAgedAged, 80 and overCOVID-19FemaleHumansImatinib MesylateMaleMiddle AgedProtein BindingProtein Kinase InhibitorsAcute-Phase ProteinsImatinib MesylateProtein Kinase Inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID34608769
PMCPMC8646516
OpenAlexW3204152887

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.