Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34608555›Full record

ArticleAnnals of surgical oncology2022

Development of a Biomarker-Based Scoring System Predicting Early Recurrence of Resectable Pancreatic Duct Adenocarcinoma.

Keinosuke Ishido, Norihisa Kimura, Taiichi Wakiya, Hayato Nagase, Yutaro Hara, Taishu Kanda, Hiroaki Fujita, Kenichi Hakamada

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of surgical oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Catching pancreatic cancer early: Are we there yet?Journal of the National Cancer Center · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Keinosuke IshidoDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Hirosaki, Japan. k-ishido@hirosaki-u.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0342-1199
Norihisa KimuraDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Hirosaki, Japan.
Taiichi WakiyaDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Hirosaki, Japan.
Hayato NagaseDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Hirosaki, Japan.
Yutaro HaraDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Hirosaki, Japan.
Taishu KandaDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Hirosaki, Japan.
Hiroaki FujitaDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Hirosaki, Japan.
Kenichi HakamadaDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Hirosaki, Japan.
Hirosaki University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundResectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (R-PDAC) often recurs early after radical resection, which is associated with poor prognosis. Predicting early recurrence preoperatively is useful for determining the optimal treatment. PATIENTS AND

methodsOne hundred and seventy-eight patients diagnosed with R-PDAC on computed tomography (CT) imaging and undergoing radical resection at Hirosaki University Hospital from 2005 to 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. Patients with recurrence within 6 months after resection formed the early recurrence (ER) group, while other patients constituted the non-early recurrence (non-ER) group. Early recurrence prediction score (ERP score) was developed using preoperative parameters.

resultsER was observed in 45 patients (25.3%). The ER group had significantly higher preoperative CA19-9 (p = 0.03), serum SPan-1 (p = 0.006), and CT tumor diameter (p = 0.01) compared with the non-ER group. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis identified cutoff values for CA19-9 (133 U/mL), SPan-1 (78.2 U/mL), and preoperative tumor diameter (23 mm). When the parameter exceeded the cutoff level, 1 point was given, and the total score of the three factors was defined as the ERP score. The group with an ERP score of 3 had postoperative recurrence-free survival (RFS) of 5.5 months (95% CI 3.02-7.98). Multivariate analysis for ER-related perioperative and surgical factors identified ERP score of 3 [odds ratio (OR) 4.63 (95% CI 1.82-11.78), p = 0.0013] and R1 resection [OR 3.20 (95% CI 1.01-10.17), p = 0.049] as independent predictors of ER.

conclusionsFor R-PDAC, ER could be predicted by the scoring system using preoperative serum CA19-9 and SPan-1 levels and CT tumor diameter, which may have great significance in identifying patients with poor prognoses and avoiding unnecessary surgery.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaCarcinoma, Pancreatic DuctalPancreatic NeoplasmsCA-19-9 AntigenHumansNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalPancreatic DuctsPrognosisRetrospective StudiesCA-19-9 AntigenCA19-9Early recurrencePancreatic ductal adenocarcinomaResectableSPan-1

Identifiers

PMID34608555
PMCPMC8724152
OpenAlexW3203223855

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.