Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34608534›Full record

ReviewDer Nervenarzt2021

[Do digital technologies at work impact mental health of employees?]

Nico Dragano, Steffi G Riedel-Heller, Thorsten Lunau

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Der Nervenarzt, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. [Job demands and resources of digital media use among teachers].Pravention und Gesundheitsforderung · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Nico DraganoInstitut für Medizinische Soziologie, Heinrich-Heine-Universität, Moorenstraße 5, 40225, Düsseldorf, Deutschland. dragano@med.uni-duesseldorf.de.
Steffi G Riedel-HellerMedizinische Fakultät, Institut für Sozialmedizin, Arbeitsmedizin und Public Health (ISAP), Universität Leipzig, Philipp-Rosenthal-Straße 55, 04103, Leipzig, Deutschland. Steffi.Riedel-Heller@medizin.uni-leipzig.de.
Thorsten LunauInstitut für Sozialforschung und Sozialwirtschaft (iso), Trillerweg 68, 66117, Saarbrücken, Deutschland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTraditional work stress research identified a large number of stressors; however, technology as a source of stress was not the focus of interest for long time.

objectiveThis article describes the concept of technostress and investigates the impact of digital technologies at work on mental health. MATERIAL AND

methodsNarrative review. Conceptualization of technostress, potential mechanisms of action and summary of empirical results on the influence on mental health.

resultsSeveral domains of technostress have been defined so far. Although empirical studies are rare and subject to methodological limitations, results suggest that certain types of technostress at work may have an adverse effect on mental health. Notably, digital technologies may also have a positive impact on the psychological well-being of employees if, for example, they enable better work organization.

conclusionThe digitalization of work is related to specific risks for the mental health of employees but also to possible benefits. Implications for further research in this developing field are identified.

Indexed as

Digital TechnologyMental HealthHumansDigitalizationMental disordersMental healthTechnostressWork stress

Identifiers

PMID34608534
PMCPMC8489371

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.