Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34608460›Full record

ArticlePublic health in practice (Oxford, England)2021

The experiences of socially vulnerable groups in England during the COVID-19 pandemic: A rapid health needs assessment.

Amy J Stevens, Anna M Ray, Ahimza Thirunavukarasu, Ella Johnson, Lucy Jones, Anna Miller, James W T Elston

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Public health in practice (Oxford, England), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Amy J StevensSchool of Public Health, Health Education England, University of Leeds, Willow Terrace Road, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK.
Anna M RaySchool of Public Health, Health Education England, University of Leeds, Willow Terrace Road, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK.
Ahimza ThirunavukarasuSchool of Public Health, Health Education England, 4 Stewart House, 32 Russell Square, Bloomsbury, London WC1B 5DN, UK.
Ella JohnsonDoctors of the World UK, 29th Floor, One Canada Square, London E14 5AA, UK.
Lucy JonesDoctors of the World UK, 29th Floor, One Canada Square, London E14 5AA, UK.
Anna MillerDoctors of the World UK, 29th Floor, One Canada Square, London E14 5AA, UK.
James W T ElstonDoctors of the World UK, 29th Floor, One Canada Square, London E14 5AA, UK.
University of Leeds · GBHealth Education England · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThis rapid health needs assessment was undertaken to urgently identify the needs of socially vulnerable groups arising during the first wave of cases of the COVID-19 pandemic in England. The objective was to develop recommendations for policy makers and stakeholders to mitigate adverse impacts on socially vulnerable groups throughout the COVID-19 response and recovery period. STUDY

designRapid health needs assessment.

methodsThe needs assessment employed qualitative methods to systematically collect data about the knowledge and views of key informants through semi-structured interviews and focus groups. Participants were either topic experts providing services to socially vulnerable groups who routinely face barriers to healthcare access or experts by experience. Participants included people experiencing homelessness, sex workers, people from Gypsy, Roma and Traveller communities and people facing challenges due to their immigration status. Data was collected over a week period in April/May 2020 and followed by thematic analysis to examine interview transcripts.

resultsForty-two participants were included in the study, half of whom were experts by experience. Challenges with accessing and following COVID-19 information and government guidance were described as affecting all groups, due to exclusion from digital technology, translated resources, tailored support and adequate housing. Altered delivery of healthcare services, such as the closure of outreach and drop-in services, remote consultations, and online patient registration, were noted by interviewees as worsening existing barriers to accessing healthcare. Being charged for NHS care remained a key fear for migrants. All groups' access to income, education and social support were reported as being impacted by service closures and job losses, putting them at higher risk of destitution. Isolation, loneliness and deteriorating mental health were frequently reported.

conclusionsThis assessment has highlighted the disproportionate impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on socially vulnerable groups and demonstrated a plethora of unmet needs. As the effects of COVID-19 continue, it is imperative that the needs of these groups are urgently and explicitly addressed and prioritised. This is essential to promote engagement with test and trace services, enable isolation adherence, and achieve high vaccine uptake in socially vulnerable populations.

Indexed as

COVID-19Digital exclusionHealth inequalitiesNeeds assessmentSocially vulnerable

Identifiers

PMID34608460
PMCPMC8481647
OpenAlexW3203127307

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.