Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34608407›Full record

ArticleJournal of healthcare engineering2021

Guopeng Ding, Dandan Li, Yingjie Sun, Keyan Chen, Dandan Song

RetractedOpen access · hybridAbstract readRetracted Publication
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of healthcare engineering, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 46% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Retracted:Journal of healthcare engineering · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Guopeng DingPostgraduate Training Base of Jinzhou Medical University in The General Hospital of Northern Theater Command, Jinzhou, Liaoning 121013, China.ORCID 0000-0003-2010-3915
Dandan LiDepartment of Anesthesiology, People's Hospital of Zhengzhou, Zhengzhou, Henan 450002, China.ORCID 0000-0002-0153-9716
Yingjie SunDepartment of Anesthesia, The General Hospital of Northern Theater Command, Shenyang, Liaoning 110016, China.ORCID 0000-0002-4976-5552
Keyan ChenDepartment of Laboratory Animal Science, China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning 110122, China.ORCID 0000-0002-8041-4312
Dandan SongDepartment of Anesthesia, The General Hospital of Northern Theater Command, Shenyang, Liaoning 110016, China.ORCID 0000-0002-2873-9187
General Hospital of Shenyang Military Region · CNChina Medical University · CNZhengzhou People's Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) is an important cardiac operation and also a high-risk procedure, leading to postoperative neurocognitive disorder. However, there are few effective drugs to treat the aftermath of CPB. Therefore, we observe the effect of kappa opioid receptor (KOR) agonist on cognitive disorders of rats after cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) and investigate the mechanism of the Ca Methods: A total of 40 Sprague Dawley rats were randomly divided into the sham operation group (sham group, Results: The KOR agonist could shorten latency, increase the swimming distance and residence time in the target quadrant, and ameliorate postoperative neurocognitive disorder (PND). Meanwhile, the KOR agonist relieved CPB-induced hippocampal and oxidative stress injuries, reduced NSE and S-100 Conclusion: The KOR agonist activates the Ca

Indexed as

Calcium-Calmodulin-Dependent Protein Kinase Type 2Receptors, Opioid, kappaAnimalsNeurocognitive DisordersRatsRats, Sprague-DawleySignal TransductionCalcium-Calmodulin-Dependent Protein Kinase Type 2Receptors, Opioid, kappa

Identifiers

PMID34608407
PMCPMC8487382
OpenAlexW3203574289

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.