Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34608404›Full record

ArticleSexuality research & social policy : journal of NSRC : SR & SP2022

"I Don't Even Want to Come Out": the Suppressed Voices of Our Future and Opening the Lid on Sexual and Gender Minority Youth Workplace Discrimination in Europe: a Qualitative Study.

Radhika Seiler-Ramadas, Lovro Markovic, Chase Staras, Laura Llop Medina, Jelena Perak, Christina Carmichael, Matej Horvat, Mario Bajkusa, Sladjana Baros, Lee Smith and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sexuality research & social policy : journal of NSRC : SR & SP, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Radhika Seiler-RamadasDepartment of Social and Preventive Medicine, Center for Public Health, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0003-0647-1105
Lovro MarkovicDepartment of Social and Preventive Medicine, Center for Public Health, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Chase StarasSchool of Psychology & Sport Science, Anglia Ruskin University, Cambridge, UK.
Laura Llop MedinaPolibienestar Research Institute, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain.
Jelena PerakForum for Freedom in Education, Zagreb, Croatia.
Christina CarmichaelCentre for Health, Performance and Wellbeing, Anglia Ruskin University, Cambridge, UK.
Matej HorvatFaculty of Law, Comenius University, Bratislava, Slovakia.
Mario BajkusaForum for Freedom in Education, Zagreb, Croatia.
Sladjana BarosCentre for Disease Control and Prevention, Institute of Public Health of Serbia "Dr. Milan JovanovicBatut", Belgrade, Serbia.
Lee SmithCentre for Health, Performance and Wellbeing, Anglia Ruskin University, Cambridge, UK.
Daragh T McDermottNTU Psychology, School of Social Sciences, Nottingham Trent University, Nottingham, UK.
Igor GrabovacDepartment of Social and Preventive Medicine, Center for Public Health, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: In Europe, young sexual and gender minority (SGM) people continue to face discrimination in the labour sector despite advances in legislation towards their acceptance and equal treatment. Non-discrimination policy strategies helping SGM individuals are not equally enforced in all contexts, making it difficult for many SGM individuals to disclose their identity, hence undermining their health and well-being. Methods: Qualitative semi-structured interviews were conducted between October 2020 and February 2021 with 55 SGM youth (18-27 years) having work experience from Austria, Croatia, Serbia, Slovakia, Spain and the UK. Results: From the analysis, three overarching themes were significant: (1) societal discrimination played a major role in sociocultural factors and policy considerations, (2) workplace discrimination had distinct factors and impacts on SGM individuals and (3) SGM inclusion should use strategies to ensure workplace diversity and equality. Conclusions: SGM individuals from contexts of poor acceptance tended to hide their identity in the workplace, while transgender and non-binary individuals were prone to experience force-disclosure and discrimination in all aspects of employment. There is a lack of resolute reaction from policy makers in managing problems faced by SGM people in workplaces. New laws improving the status of SGM people need to be further adopted, staff training should be implemented, and managers are crucial in achieving an inclusive climate in the workplace.Policy ImplicationsIt is essential to implement policies on how to effectively handle problems faced by sexual and gender minority people in the workplace.

Indexed as

Anti-discrimination policyLGBT youthMental healthSexual minorityWorkplace discrimination

Identifiers

PMID34608404
PMCPMC8481111

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.