Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34608321›Full record

ReviewNature methods2021

Differentiable biology: using deep learning for biophysics-based and data-driven modeling of molecular mechanisms.

Mohammed AlQuraishi, Peter K Sorger

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nature methods, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Amplicon/Protein Bead Display enables quantitativebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Physics-guided design of intrinsically disordered proteins.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. IFNIKB: a type I interferon database for antitumuor immunity studies.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Mohammed AlQuraishiDepartment of Systems Biology, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA. m.alquraishi@columbia.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6817-1322
Peter K SorgerLaboratory of Systems Pharmacology, Department of Systems Biology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA. peter_sorger@hms.harvard.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3364-1838

Funding

Systems Pharmacology of Therapeutic and Adverse Responses to ImmuneCheckpoint and Small Molecule DrugsU54CA225088 · NCI · HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL · PI SORGER, PETER KARL · 2018 to 2022
$10.8M
NCI NIH HHS U54 CA225088
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Deep learning using neural networks relies on a class of machine-learnable models constructed using 'differentiable programs'. These programs can combine mathematical equations specific to a particular domain of natural science with general-purpose, machine-learnable components trained on experimental data. Such programs are having a growing impact on molecular and cellular biology. In this Perspective, we describe an emerging 'differentiable biology' in which phenomena ranging from the small and specific (for example, one experimental assay) to the broad and complex (for example, protein folding) can be modeled effectively and efficiently, often by exploiting knowledge about basic natural phenomena to overcome the limitations of sparse, incomplete and noisy data. By distilling differentiable biology into a small set of conceptual primitives and illustrative vignettes, we show how it can help to address long-standing challenges in integrating multimodal data from diverse experiments across biological scales. This promises to benefit fields as diverse as biophysics and functional genomics.

Indexed as

Deep LearningNeural Networks, ComputerBiophysicsComputational BiologyComputational ChemistryModels, ChemicalPattern Recognition, AutomatedProtein ConformationProteinsProteins

Identifiers

PMID34608321
PMCPMC8793939

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.