Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34608182›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2021

Soil microbiota and microarthropod communities in oil contaminated sites in the European Subarctic.

E N Melekhina, E S Belykh, M Yu Markarova, A A Taskaeva, E E Rasova, O A Baturina, M R Kabilov, I O Velegzhaninov

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

E N MelekhinaInstitute of Biology, Komi Scientific Center, Ural Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences (IB FRC Komi SC UB RAS), Kommunisticheskaya 28, 167982, Syktyvkar, Russia.
E S BelykhInstitute of Biology, Komi Scientific Center, Ural Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences (IB FRC Komi SC UB RAS), Kommunisticheskaya 28, 167982, Syktyvkar, Russia.
M Yu MarkarovaInstitute of Biology, Komi Scientific Center, Ural Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences (IB FRC Komi SC UB RAS), Kommunisticheskaya 28, 167982, Syktyvkar, Russia.
A A TaskaevaInstitute of Biology, Komi Scientific Center, Ural Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences (IB FRC Komi SC UB RAS), Kommunisticheskaya 28, 167982, Syktyvkar, Russia.
E E RasovaInstitute of Biology, Komi Scientific Center, Ural Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences (IB FRC Komi SC UB RAS), Kommunisticheskaya 28, 167982, Syktyvkar, Russia.
O A BaturinaInstitute of Chemical Biology and Fundamental Medicine, Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences (ICBFM SB RAS), Lavrentieva 8, 630090, Novosibirsk, Russia.
M R KabilovInstitute of Chemical Biology and Fundamental Medicine, Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences (ICBFM SB RAS), Lavrentieva 8, 630090, Novosibirsk, Russia.
I O VelegzhaninovInstitute of Biology, Komi Scientific Center, Ural Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences (IB FRC Komi SC UB RAS), Kommunisticheskaya 28, 167982, Syktyvkar, Russia. vellio@yandex.ru.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The present comprehensive study aimed to estimate the aftermath of oil contamination and the efficacy of removing the upper level of polluted soil under the conditions of the extreme northern taiga of northeastern European Russia. Soil samples from three sites were studied. Two sites were contaminated with the contents of a nearby sludge collector five years prior to sampling. The highly contaminated upper soil level was removed from one of them. The other was left for self-restoration. A chemical analysis of the soils was conducted, and changes in the composition of the soil zoocoenosis and bacterial and fungal microbiota were investigated. At both contaminated sites, a decrease in the abundance and taxonomic diversity of indicator groups of soil fauna, oribatid mites and collembolans compared to the background site were found. The pioneer eurytopic species Oppiella nova, Proisotoma minima and Xenyllodes armatus formed the basis of the microarthropod populations in the contaminated soil. A complete change in the composition of dominant taxonomic units was observed in the microbiota, both the bacterial and fungal communities. There was an increase in the proportion of representatives of Proteobacteria and Actinobacteria in polluted soils compared to the background community. Hydrocarbon-degrading bacteria-Alcanivorax, Rhodanobacter ginsengisoli, Acidobacterium capsulatum, and Acidocella-and fungi-Amorphotheca resinae abundances greatly increased in oil-contaminated soil. Moreover, among both bacteria and fungi, a sharp increase in the abundance of uncultivated organisms that deserve additional attention as potential oil degraders or organisms with a high resistance to oil contamination were observed. The removal of the upper soil level was partly effective in terms of decreasing the oil product concentration (from approximately 21 to 2.6 g/kg of soil) and preventing a decrease in taxonomic richness but did not prevent alterations in the composition of the microbiota or zoocoenosis.

Indexed as

ArthropodsMicrobiotaPetroleum PollutionSoil MicrobiologySoil PollutantsAnimalsArctic RegionsBiodiversityCarbonEuropeHydrogen-Ion ConcentrationNitrogenRussiaSoilCarbonNitrogenSoilSoil Pollutants

Identifiers

PMID34608182
PMCPMC8490368

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.