Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34607862›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2021

Understanding quality of contraceptive services from women's perspectives in Gujarat, India: a focus group study.

Kelsey Holt, Bella Vasant Uttekar, Reiley Reed, Madeline Adams, Lakhwani Kanchan, Ana Langer, Sandhya Barge

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Kelsey HoltDepartment of Family & Community Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA kelsey.holt@ucsf.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-9093-4322
Bella Vasant UttekarCentre for Operations Research and Training, Vadodara, Gujarat, India.
Reiley ReedDepartment of Family & Community Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA.
Madeline AdamsGlobal Health and Population, Harvard University T H Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Lakhwani KanchanCentre for Operations Research and Training, Vadodara, Gujarat, India.
Ana LangerGlobal Health and Population, Harvard University T H Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Sandhya BargeCentre for Operations Research and Training, Vadodara, Gujarat, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesUnderstanding quality of contraceptive care from clients' perspectives is critical to ensuring acceptable and non-harmful services, yet little qualitative research has been dedicated to this topic. India's history of using incentives to promote contraceptive use, combined with reports of unsafe conditions in sterilisation camps, make a focus on quality important. The study objective was to understand women's experiences with and preferences for contraceptive counselling and care in the public sector in India.

designQualitative study using eight focus group discussions (FGDs). FGDs were thematically analysed using a framework approach.

settingRural and urban areas in one district in Gujarat.

participants31 sterilisation and 42 reversible contraceptive users who were married and represented different backgrounds. Inclusion criteria were: (1) female, (2) at least 18 years and (3) receipt of contraception services in the last 6 months from public health services.

resultsProviders motivate married women to use contraception and guide women to specific methods based on how many children they have. Participants found this common practice acceptable. Participants also discussed the lack of counselling about reversible and permanent options and expressed a need for more information on side effects of reversible methods. There were mixed opinions about whether compensation received for accepting long-term methods affects contraceptive decision making. While many women were satisfied with their experiences, we identified minor themes related to provider coercion towards provider-controlled methods and disrespectful and abusive treatment during sterilisation care, both of which require concerted efforts to address systemic factors enabling such experiences.

conclusionsFindings illuminate opportunities for quality improvement as we identified several gaps between how women experience contraceptive care and their preferences, and with ideals of quality and rights frameworks. Findings informed adaptation of the Quality of Contraceptive Counselling Scale for India, and have implications for centring quality and rights in global efforts.

Indexed as

ContraceptionContraceptive AgentsChildContraception BehaviorFamily Planning ServicesFemaleFocus GroupsHumansIndiaContraceptive Agentsqualitative researchquality in health carereproductive medicine

Identifiers

PMID34607862
PMCPMC8491289

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.