Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34607597›Full record

Trial reportBMC oral health2021

Effect of free gingival graft before implant placement on peri-implant health and soft tissue changes: a randomized controlled trial.

Chaoling Zheng, Shimin Wang, Hongqiang Ye, Yunsong Liu, Wenjie Hu, Yongsheng Zhou

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC oral health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Timing of keratinized mucosa augmentation and peri-implant outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of prosthodontics : official journal of the American College of Prosthodontists · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Chaoling ZhengDepartment of Prosthodontics, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology, Beijing, 100081, People's Republic of China.
Shimin WangDepartment of Prosthodontics, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology, Beijing, 100081, People's Republic of China.
Hongqiang YeDepartment of Prosthodontics, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology, Beijing, 100081, People's Republic of China.
Yunsong LiuDepartment of Prosthodontics, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology, Beijing, 100081, People's Republic of China. liuyunsong@hsc.pku.edu.cn.
Wenjie HuDepartment of Periodontics, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology, Beijing, 100081, People's Republic of China. huwenjie@pkuss.bjmu.edu.cn.
Yongsheng ZhouDepartment of Prosthodontics, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology, Beijing, 100081, People's Republic of China.
Peking University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo evaluate the clinical outcome and changes in posterior buccal soft tissue following implant restoration in groups with and without a free gingival graft (FGG) before implant placement.

methodsTwenty-six individuals who required implant restoration and displayed lack of keratinized mucosa (KM) were recruited and assigned to the FGG group (with FGG before implant placement) or Control group (without FGG before implant placement) randomly. A screw-retained conventional implant restoration was performed for each patient. Peri-implant soft tissue was captured by an intraoral scanner and analyzed by an image processing software. Clinical parameters (plaque index, gingival index, probing depth, and bleeding on probing) were assessed at baseline and 1, 3, 6, and 12 months. Buccal soft tissue changes (mucosal margin, soft tissue thickness, and width of keratinized mucosa) on the buccal side of implant site were assessed at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months. Two-way ANOVA and Bonferroni test were used to analyze significant difference between groups at each time point (α = 0.05).

resultsThe clinical parameters were lower in the FGG group than that in the Control group, although there were no significant differences between the two groups (P > 0.05). Peri-implant soft tissue collapsed and the changes (mucosal margin and soft tissue thickness) were significantly greater in the Control group than the FGG group (P < 0.05). Width of KM was larger in the FGG group than the Control group, although there was no significant difference between the two groups (P > 0.05).

conclusionsMinimal peri-implant soft tissue changes occurred in two groups. Performing FGG before implant placement is a viable procedure to maintain peri-implant soft tissue but might not affect peri-implant health during 12 months follow-up. However, small sample size must be considered. Trial registration This study was retrospectively registered in the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (Registration number: ChiCTR2000037954; Date of registration: 6 September 2020).

Indexed as

Dental ImplantsOral Surgical ProceduresDental Plaque IndexGingivaHumansPeriodontal IndexDental ImplantsClinical outcomeFree gingival graftPosterior implant restorationSoft tissue changes

Identifiers

PMID34607597
PMCPMC8489082
OpenAlexW3203558693

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.