Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34607555›Full record

ArticleBMC infectious diseases2021

Outbreaks of mumps genotype G viruses in the Netherlands between October 2019 and March 2020: clusters associated with multiple introductions.

Anita A Shah, Rogier Bodewes, Linda Reijnen, Timo Boelsums, Claudia M Weller, Ewout B Fanoy, Irene K Veldhuijzen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC infectious diseases, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Anita A ShahCenter for Infectious Disease Control, National Institute for Public Health and Environment (RIVM), Bilthoven, The Netherlands. anita.shah@rivm.nl.
Rogier BodewesCenter for Infectious Disease Control, National Institute for Public Health and Environment (RIVM), Bilthoven, The Netherlands.
Linda ReijnenCenter for Infectious Disease Control, National Institute for Public Health and Environment (RIVM), Bilthoven, The Netherlands.
Timo BoelsumsDepartment of Infectious Disease Control, Public Health Service Rotterdam-Rijnmond (GGD), Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Claudia M WellerDepartment of Infectious Disease Control, Public Health Service Rotterdam-Rijnmond (GGD), Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Ewout B FanoyDepartment of Infectious Disease Control, Public Health Service Rotterdam-Rijnmond (GGD), Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Irene K VeldhuijzenCenter for Infectious Disease Control, National Institute for Public Health and Environment (RIVM), Bilthoven, The Netherlands.
National Institute for Public Health and the Environment · NLGGD Rotterdam-Rijnmond · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFrom October 2019-March 2020, several clusters of mumps cases were identified in the Netherlands. Our objective was to describe cluster-associated mumps virus transmission using epidemiological and molecular information in order to help future mumps outbreak investigation and control efforts.

methodsAn epidemiological cluster includes ≥ 2 mumps cases with at least an epidemiological-link to a laboratory-confirmed mumps case. A molecular group includes ≥ 2 mumps cases with identical mumps virus sequences. Cases with symptom onset date between 1 October 2019 and 31 March 2020 reported through the National Notifiable Diseases Surveillance System were included. We described epidemiological and clinical characteristics of mumps cases. Sequence data was obtained from selected regions of mumps virus genomes (2270 nucleotides). Associations between epidemiological and molecular information were investigated.

resultsIn total, 102 mumps cases were notified (90% laboratory-confirmed, 10% epidemiologically-linked). 71 out of 102 cases were identified as part of an epidemiological cluster and/or molecular group. Twenty-one (30%) of 71 cases were identified solely from epidemiological information, 25 (35%) solely from molecular surveillance, and 25 (35%) using both. Fourteen epidemiological clusters were identified containing a total of 46 (range: 2-12, median: 3) cases. Complete sequence data was obtained from 50 mumps genotype G viruses. Twelve molecular groups were identified containing 43 (range: 2-13) cases, dispersed geographically and timewise. Combined information grouped seven epidemiological clusters into two distinct molecular groups. The first lasting for 14 weeks, the other for 6. Additionally, one molecular group was detected, linked by geography and time but without an epidemiological-link.

conclusionsCombined epidemiological and molecular information indicated ongoing mumps virus transmission from multiple introductions for extended time periods. Sequence analysis provided valuable insights into epidemiological clustering. If combined information is available in a timely manner, this would improve outbreak detection, generate further insight into mumps transmission, and guide necessary control measures.

Indexed as

MumpsMumps virusDisease OutbreaksGenotypeHumansNetherlandsPhylogenyGenotype G virusesMMRMumpsSurveillanceThe Netherlands

Identifiers

PMID34607555
PMCPMC8488918
OpenAlexW3157324672

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.