Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34607499›Full record

SynthesisActa orthopaedica2022

Prognostic factors for recurrent idiopathic clubfoot deformity: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis.

Heleen Van Schelven, Sophie Moerman, Marieke Van der Steen, Arnold T Besselaar, Christian Greve

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Acta orthopaedica, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Association of Polymorphism in Locus of rs274503 (Genetic testing and molecular biomarkers · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Heleen Van SchelvenCenter for Human Movement Sciences, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen. heleen100@hotmail.com.
Sophie MoermanDepartment of Orthopedics, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen. Sophie-moerman@hotmail.com.
Marieke Van der SteenDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery & Trauma, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery & Trauma, Máxima Medical Center, Veldhoven. Marieke.vander.Steen@mmc.nl.
Arnold T BesselaarDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery & Trauma, Máxima Medical Center, Veldhoven. A.Besselaar@mmc.nl.
Christian GreveCenter for Human Movement Sciences, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen; Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands. c.greve@umcg.nl.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and purpose - After initial clubfoot correction through Ponseti treatment, recurrence rates range from 26% to 48%. Even though various factors have been associated with increased recurrence risk, systematic assessments of the prognostic capacity of recurrence risk factors and their clinical relevance are lacking. Therefore we assessed clinically relevant prognostic factors for recurrent idiopathic clubfoot deformity after initial correction through Ponseti treatment. Methods - PubMed, Embase, Cinahl, and Web of Science were systematically searched for studies investigating the association between clinically relevant factors and recurrence rates. Prognostic factors were qualitatively assessed and included in the meta-analysis if ≥ 2 studies investigated the same factor and methods were comparable. Results - 34 articles were included in the qualitative synthesis, of which 22 were also included in the meta-analysis. Meta-analysis revealed that poor evertor muscle activity (OR = 255, 95% CI 30-2,190), brace non-compliance (OR = 10, CI 5-21), no additional stretching (OR = 31, CI 10-101), more casts (OR = 3.5, CI 1.6-7.8), lower education level of parents (OR = 1.8, CI 1.2-2.6), non-marital status of parents (OR = 1.8, CI 1.1-3.0), and higher Dimeglio scores (OR = 1.9, CI 1.2-3.3) were associated with higher recurrence rates. Interpretation - Brace non-compliance and poor evertor muscle activity have been identified as main recurrence risk factors and are therefore important to be closely monitored during clinical follow-up of clubfoot patients. Adding additional stretching during the bracing protocol might be promising in the quest to prevent relapse, but scientific evidence for clear clinical treatment recommendations is still limited.

Indexed as

BracesCasts, SurgicalClubfootCombined Modality TherapyHumansMuscle WeaknessPatient CompliancePlastic Surgery ProceduresPrognosisRecurrenceRisk FactorsSecondary PreventionSeverity of Illness Index

Identifiers

PMID34607499
PMCPMC8815420

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.