SynthesisActa orthopaedica2022
Prognostic factors for recurrent idiopathic clubfoot deformity: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Acta orthopaedica, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Global prevalence, patterns, and predictors of relapse following Ponseti treatment for idiopathic clubfoot: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2026Pooled it
- Efficacy of Total Tibialis Anterior Tendon Transfer using Button Anchor in Management of Residual Dynamic Supination in Congenital Talipes Equino Varus.Malaysian orthopaedic journal · 2026Article
- Virtual 3D landmark palpation in clubfoot: feasibility of an innovative standardized morphometric protocol. A preliminary study.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2026Article
- Effectiveness of a digital-based gradual exercise training program for preventing relapse in congenital clubfoot: a protocol for a randomized controlled clinical trial.BMC pediatrics · 2025Article
- Rate and predictors of relapse and surgery in idiopathic clubfeet after successful Ponseti treatment in infancy : a single centre, retrospective, comparative study.Bone & joint open · 2025Article
- Association of Polymorphism in Locus of rs274503 (Genetic testing and molecular biomarkers · 2024Article
- Harnessing the Biomimetic Effect of Macromolecular Crowding in the Cell-Derived Model of Clubfoot Fibrosis.Biomacromolecules · 2024Article
- Psychosocial Impacts of Idiopathic Clubfoot on Parents and Children: A Scoping Review Protocol.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Prevalence and associated factors of clubfoot in the eastern province of Saudi Arabia: A hospital-based study.World journal of orthopedics · 2024Article
- Tibialis anterior tendon transfer using suture anchor provides excellent alternative treatment for relapse clubfoot: A case report.International journal of surgery case reports · 2023Article
- The Predictive Value of Radiographs and the Pirani Score for Later Additional Surgery in Ponseti-Treated Idiopathic Clubfeet, an Observational Cohort Study.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and purpose - After initial clubfoot correction through Ponseti treatment, recurrence rates range from 26% to 48%. Even though various factors have been associated with increased recurrence risk, systematic assessments of the prognostic capacity of recurrence risk factors and their clinical relevance are lacking. Therefore we assessed clinically relevant prognostic factors for recurrent idiopathic clubfoot deformity after initial correction through Ponseti treatment. Methods - PubMed, Embase, Cinahl, and Web of Science were systematically searched for studies investigating the association between clinically relevant factors and recurrence rates. Prognostic factors were qualitatively assessed and included in the meta-analysis if ≥ 2 studies investigated the same factor and methods were comparable. Results - 34 articles were included in the qualitative synthesis, of which 22 were also included in the meta-analysis. Meta-analysis revealed that poor evertor muscle activity (OR = 255, 95% CI 30-2,190), brace non-compliance (OR = 10, CI 5-21), no additional stretching (OR = 31, CI 10-101), more casts (OR = 3.5, CI 1.6-7.8), lower education level of parents (OR = 1.8, CI 1.2-2.6), non-marital status of parents (OR = 1.8, CI 1.1-3.0), and higher Dimeglio scores (OR = 1.9, CI 1.2-3.3) were associated with higher recurrence rates. Interpretation - Brace non-compliance and poor evertor muscle activity have been identified as main recurrence risk factors and are therefore important to be closely monitored during clinical follow-up of clubfoot patients. Adding additional stretching during the bracing protocol might be promising in the quest to prevent relapse, but scientific evidence for clear clinical treatment recommendations is still limited.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.