Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34607290›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of medical informatics2021

Subcategorizing EHR diagnosis codes to improve clinical application of machine learning models.

Andrew P Reimer, Wei Dai, Benjamin Smith, Nicholas K Schiltz, Jiayang Sun, Siran M Koroukian

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of medical informatics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Observational
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Andrew P ReimerFrances Payne Bolton School of Nursing, Case Western Reserve University, 10900 Euclid Ave, Cleveland, OH, United States; Critical Care Transport, Cleveland Clinic, 9800 Euclid Ave, Cleveland, OH, United States. Electronic address: axr62@cwru.edu.
Wei DaiPopulation and Quantitative Health Sciences, School of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, United States.
Benjamin SmithDepartment of Mathematics, Applied Mathematics and Statistics, College of Arts and Sciences, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, United States.
Nicholas K SchiltzFrances Payne Bolton School of Nursing, Case Western Reserve University, 10900 Euclid Ave, Cleveland, OH, United States.
Jiayang SunPopulation and Quantitative Health Sciences, School of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, United States.
Siran M KoroukianPopulation and Quantitative Health Sciences, School of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, United States.

Funding

Identifying Electronic Phenotypes associated with Patient Health Outcomes of Interhospital Transfer PatientsR15NR017792 · NINR · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI REIMER, ANDREW PAUL · 2018 to 2018
$477k
NINR NIH HHS R15 NR017792
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundElectronic health record (EHR) data is commonly used for secondary purposes such as research and clinical decision support. However, reuse of EHR data presents several challenges including but not limited to identifying all diagnoses associated with a patient's clinical encounter. The purpose of this study was to assess the feasibility of developing a schema to identify and subclassify all structured diagnosis codes for a patient encounter.

methodsTo develop a subclassification schema we used EHR data from an interhospital transport data repository that contained complete hospital encounter level data. Eight discrete data sources containing structured diagnosis codes were identified. Diagnosis codes were normalized using the Unified Medical Language System and additional EHR data were combined with standardized terminologies to create and validate the subcategories. We then employed random forest to assess the usefulness of the new subcategorized diagnoses to predict post-interhospital transfer mortality by building 2 models, one using standard diagnosis codes, and one using the new subcategorized diagnosis codes.

resultsSix subcategories of diagnoses were identified and validated. The subcategories included: primary or admitting diagnoses (10%), past medical, surgical or social history (9%), problem list (20%), comorbidity (24%), discharge diagnoses (6%), and unmapped diagnoses (31%). The subcategorized model outperformed the standard model, achieving a training AUROC of 0.97 versus 0.95 and testing model AUROC of 0.81 versus 0.46. DISCUSSION: Our work demonstrates that merging structured diagnosis codes with additional EHR data and secondary data sources provides additional information to understand the role of diagnosis throughout a clinical encounter and improves predictive model performance. Further work is necessary to assess if subcategorizing produces benefits in interpreting the results of prognostic models and/or operationalizing the results in clinical decision support applications.

Indexed as

Electronic Health RecordsMachine LearningComorbidityHumansInformation Storage and RetrievalUnified Medical Language SystemData managementElectronic data processingElectronic health recordsMachine learning

Identifiers

PMID34607290
PMCPMC8571032

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.