Trial reportESMO open2021
First-line nivolumab plus ipilimumab with two cycles of chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone (four cycles) in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: CheckMate 9LA 2-year update.
Trial report in ESMO open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 106 papers, 15 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
106 citing papers in PubMed, 15 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 185 citations in OpenAlex.
- Efficacy and safety of immunotherapy in driver mutation-negative advanced non-small cell lung cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.The Indian journal of medical research · 2026Pooled it
- The optimal duration of immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy in advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review of clinical trials.BMC pulmonary medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Use of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors in non-small cell lung cancer in elderly patients: a meta-analysis and systematic review of randomized clinical trials.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026Pooled it
- Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: efficacy, safety, and biomarkers - a systematic review.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Pooled it
- Predictive value of machine learning for radiation pneumonitis and checkpoint inhibitor pneumonitis in lung cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Scientific reports · 2025Pooled it
- Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Immunotherapy on Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients With Brain Metastases: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.The clinical respiratory journal · 2024Pooled it
- First-line immune checkpoint inhibitors in low programmed death-ligand 1-expressing population.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2024Pooled it
- Surrogate endpoints for overall survival in randomized clinical trials testing immune checkpoint inhibitors: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in immunology · 2024Pooled it
- Complete remissions following immunotherapy or immuno-oncology combinations in cancer patients: the MOUSEION-03 meta-analysis.Cancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII · 2023Pooled it
- Treatment-free survival after discontinuation of immune checkpoint inhibitors in mNSCLC: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in immunology · 2023Pooled it
- Checkpoint inhibitors as dual immunotherapy in advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a meta-analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Pooled it
- Analysis of Cancer Survival Associated With Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors After Statistical Adjustment: A Systematic Review and Meta-analyses.JAMA network open · 2022Pooled it
- A systematic review and network meta-analysis of first-line immune checkpoint inhibitor combination therapies in patients with advanced non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer.Frontiers in immunology · 2022Pooled it
- The influence of baseline characteristics on the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors for advanced lung cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2022Pooled it
- Assessing the Relationship Between Liver Metastases and the Survival of Patients With Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer After Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors Treatment: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Integrative cancer therapiesPooled it
- Trial
- KN046, a bispecific antibody against PD-L1 and CTLA-4, plus chemotherapy as first-line treatment for metastatic NSCLC: A multicenter phase 2 trial.Cell reports. Medicine · 2024Trial
- Four-year clinical update and treatment switching-adjusted outcomes with first-line nivolumab plus ipilimumab with chemotherapy for metastatic non-small cell lung cancer in the CheckMate 9LA randomized trial.Journal for immunotherapy of cancer · 2024Trial
- A phase Ib study evaluating the safety and efficacy of IBI310 plus sintilimab in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer who have progressed after anti-PD-1/L1 therapy.Cancer medicine · 2024Trial
- QL1706 (anti-PD-1 IgG4/CTLA-4 antibody) plus chemotherapy with or without bevacizumab in advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a multi-cohort, phase II study.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2024Trial
46 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
27 authors at 20 institutions in 12 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTo further characterize survival benefit with first-line nivolumab plus ipilimumab with two cycles of chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone, we report updated data from the phase III CheckMate 9LA trial with a 2-year minimum follow-up. PATIENTS AND
methodsAdult patients were treatment naïve, with stage IV/recurrent non-small-cell lung cancer, no known sensitizing EGFR/ALK alterations, and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status ≤1. Patients were randomized 1 : 1 to nivolumab 360 mg every 3 weeks plus ipilimumab 1 mg/kg every 6 weeks with two cycles of chemotherapy, or four cycles of chemotherapy. Updated efficacy and safety outcomes are reported, along with progression-free survival (PFS) after next line of treatment (PFS2), treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) by treatment cycle, and efficacy outcomes in patients who discontinued all treatment components in the experimental arm due to TRAEs.
resultsWith a median follow-up of 30.7 months, nivolumab plus ipilimumab with chemotherapy continued to prolong overall survival (OS) versus chemotherapy. Median OS was 15.8 versus 11.0 months [hazard ratio 0.72 (95% confidence interval 0.61-0.86)]; 2-year OS rate was 38% versus 26%. Two-year PFS rate was 20% versus 8%. ORR was 38% versus 25%, respectively; 34% versus 12% of all responses were ongoing at 2 years. Median PFS2 was 13.9 versus 8.7 months. Improved efficacy outcomes in the experimental versus control arm were observed across most subgroups, including by programmed death-ligand 1 and histology. No new safety signals were observed; onset of grade 3/4 TRAEs was mostly observed during the first two treatment cycles in the experimental arm. In patients who discontinued all components of nivolumab plus ipilimumab with chemotherapy treatment due to TRAEs (n = 61) median OS was 27.5 months; 56% of responders had an ongoing response ≥1 year after discontinuation.
conclusionsWith a 2-year minimum follow-up, nivolumab plus ipilimumab with two cycles of chemotherapy provided durable efficacy benefits over chemotherapy with a manageable safety profile and remains an efficacious first-line treatment of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.