ArticleClinical biomechanics (Bristol, Avon)2021
Anticipatory and reactive responses to underfoot perturbations during gait in healthy adults and individuals with a recent mild traumatic brain injury.
Article in Clinical biomechanics (Bristol, Avon), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Perturbations during Gait: A Systematic Review of Methodologies and Outcomes.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Pooled it
- Optimization and Randomized Controlled Evaluation of Plantar White Noise Vibration for Balance Improvement in Young Adults.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Trial
- Reactive Balance Deficits Differ in People After Mild Traumatic Brain Injury Based on Chronicity of Self-Reported Symptoms.Neurorehabilitation and neural repair · 2026Article
- Effects of unexpected underfoot perturbations during turning on measures of mediolateral stability and corresponding recovery strategies.The Journal of experimental biology · 2026Article
- Cortical activity during preparation and execution of balance recovery behavior in people after mild traumatic brain injury: A preliminary investigation.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
- Acute and Longitudinal Effects of Concussion on Reactive Balance in Collegiate Athletes.Neurorehabilitation and neural repair · 2025Article
- The effects of physical and temporal certainty on human locomotion with discrete underfoot perturbations.The Journal of experimental biology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundFollowing mild traumatic brain injury, individuals often exhibit quantifiable gait deficits over flat surfaces, but little is known about how they control gait over complex surfaces. Such complex surfaces require precise neuromotor control to anticipate and react to small disturbances in walking surfaces, and mild traumatic brain injury-related balance deficits may adversely affect these gait adjustments.
methodsThis study investigates anticipatory and reactive gait adjustments for expected and unexpected underfoot perturbations in healthy adults (n = 5) and individuals with mild traumatic brain injury (n = 5). Participants completed walking trials with random unexpected or expected underfoot perturbations from a mechanized shoe and inertial measurement units collected kinematic data from the feet and sternum. Linear mixed-effects models assessed the effects of segment, group, and their interaction on standardized difference of accelerations between perturbation and non-perturbation trials.
findingsBoth groups demonstrated similar gait strategies when perturbations were unexpected. During late swing phase before expected perturbations, persons with mild traumatic brain injury exhibited greater lateral acceleration of their perturbed foot and less lateral movement of their trunk compared with unperturbed gait. Control participants exhibited less lateral foot acceleration and no difference in mediolateral trunk acceleration compared with unperturbed gait during the same period. A significant group*segment interaction (p < 0.001) during this part of the gait cycle suggests the groups adopted different anticipatory strategies for the perturbation.
interpretationIndividuals with mild traumatic brain injury may be adopting cautious strategies for expected perturbations due to persistent neuromechanical deficits stemming from their injury.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.