Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34606730›Full record

ArticlePerspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science2022

From Text to Thought: How Analyzing Language Can Advance Psychological Science.

Joshua Conrad Jackson, Joseph Watts, Johann-Mattis List, Curtis Puryear, Ryan Drabble, Kristen A Lindquist

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. New opportunities and challenges for conservation evidence synthesis from advances in natural language processing.Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology · 2025
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Joshua Conrad JacksonDepartment of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.ORCID 0000-0002-2947-9815
Joseph WattsDepartment of Linguistic and Cultural Evolution, Max Planck Institute for the Science of Human History.ORCID 0000-0002-7737-273X
Johann-Mattis ListDepartment of Linguistic and Cultural Evolution, Max Planck Institute for the Science of Human History.
Curtis PuryearDepartment of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
Ryan DrabbleDepartment of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
Kristen A LindquistDepartment of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.ORCID 0000-0002-5368-9302

Funding

Neurobiological susceptibility to peer influence and drug use in adolescenceR01DA051127 · NIDA · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI TELZER, EVA HAIMO · 2020 to 2025
$3.5M
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA051127
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Humans have been using language for millennia but have only just begun to scratch the surface of what natural language can reveal about the mind. Here we propose that language offers a unique window into psychology. After briefly summarizing the legacy of language analyses in psychological science, we show how methodological advances have made these analyses more feasible and insightful than ever before. In particular, we describe how two forms of language analysis-natural-language processing and comparative linguistics-are contributing to how we understand topics as diverse as emotion, creativity, and religion and overcoming obstacles related to statistical power and culturally diverse samples. We summarize resources for learning both of these methods and highlight the best way to combine language analysis with more traditional psychological paradigms. Applying language analysis to large-scale and cross-cultural datasets promises to provide major breakthroughs in psychological science.

Indexed as

LanguageLinguisticsEmotionsHumansLearningcomparative linguisticscreativitycultural evolutionemotionhistorical linguisticsnatural-language processingpsycholinguisticsreligion

Identifiers

PMID34606730
PMCPMC9069665

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.