Trial reportAnesthesia progress2021
Cardiovascular Safety and Hemostatic Efficacy of Topical Epinephrine in Children Receiving Zirconia Crowns.
Trial report in Anesthesia progress, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThe primary aim of this study was to determine the cardiovascular safety of topical racemic epinephrine pellets by measuring heart rate, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, and mean arterial pressure in children receiving dental care under general anesthesia. The secondary aim was to assess clinical efficacy by measuring time to reach adequate hemostasis.
methodsFor this pilot study utilizing a split-mouth randomized design, 13 patients requiring prefabricated zirconia crowns on both primary maxillary first molars were recruited. Patients received continuous infusions of propofol and remifentanil with 50-70% inhaled nitrous oxide and oxygen. After randomization and tooth preparation, either saline pellets (control) or racemic epinephrine pellets (experimental) were applied directly to gingival tissue. Vital signs were recorded for 5 minutes. The procedure was repeated on the contralateral side using the alternative (control or experimental) treatment.
resultsTopical racemic epinephrine compared to saline produced a significantly larger decrease in mean diastolic blood pressure (-11.1% vs -3.9%; P < .01) and mean arterial pressure (-8.1% vs -2.1%; P < .01), although all noted decreases in cardiovascular variables were clinically insignificant. All experimental treatment teeth achieved adequate hemostasis after 2.2 minutes. Only 5 of the 13 control treatment teeth achieved adequate hemostasis during the 5-minute observation period (1.6 vs 4.2 minutes; P = .01).
conclusionOverall, we conclude that use of topical racemic epinephrine pellets did not result in adverse cardiovascular effects and hemostasis was reached more quickly and predictably compared to saline pellets.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.