Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34606501›Full record

Observational studyPLoS neglected tropical diseases2021

Serological response to nifurtimox in adult patients with chronic Chagas disease: An observational comparative study in Argentina.

David Vizcaya, Ulrike Grossmann, Frank Kleinjung, Ruiping Zhang, Kiliana Suzart-Woischnik, Sandra Seu, Teresa Ramirez, Leylen Colmegna, Oscar Ledesma

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readComparative StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03784391 (Effectiveness of Nifurtimox in Patients With Chagas' Disease Based on Data From Patient Medical Records in Argentina), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03784391 completednot on this map

Effectiveness of Nifurtimox in Patients With Chagas' Disease Based on Data From Patient Medical Records in Argentina: a Retrospective Medical Chart Review Study

TypeobservationalSponsorBayerRan2018 to 2020Enrolled3,000ConditionsChagas' DiseaseArmsLampit (Nifurtimox, BAYA2502)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

David VizcayaBayer Pharmaceuticals, Sant Joan Despi, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-0248-7636
Ulrike GrossmannBayer AG, Berlin, Germany.
Frank KleinjungBayer AG, Berlin, Germany.
Ruiping ZhangBayer HealthCare, Beijing, China.ORCID 0000-0003-4095-7600
Kiliana Suzart-WoischnikBayer AG, Berlin, Germany.
Sandra SeuCentro de Chagas y Patología Regional, Hospital Independencia, Santiago del Estero, Argentina.
Teresa RamirezCentro de Chagas y Patología Regional, Hospital Independencia, Santiago del Estero, Argentina.
Leylen ColmegnaLAT Research, Buenos Aires, Argentina.ORCID 0000-0002-6940-4076
Oscar LedesmaCentro de Chagas y Patología Regional, Hospital Independencia, Santiago del Estero, Argentina.
Bayer (Germany) · DEBayer (China) · CNInstitute of Scientific and Technical Research for Defense · AR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nifurtimox is indicated in Chagas disease but determining its effectiveness in chronic disease is hindered by the length of time needed to demonstrate negative serological conversion. We manually reviewed long-term follow-up data from hospital records of patients with chronic Chagas disease (N = 1,497) in Argentina diagnosed during 1967-1980. All patients were aged ≥18 years at diagnosis and were either treated with nifurtimox (n = 968) or received no antitrypanosomal treatment (n = 529). The primary endpoint was negative seroconversion (the "event"), defined as a change from positive to negative in the serological or parasitological laboratory test used at diagnosis. Time to event was from baseline visit to date of endpoint event or censoring. The effectiveness of nifurtimox versus no treatment was estimated with Cox proportional hazard regression using propensity scores with overlap weights to calculate the hazard ratio and 95% confidence interval. The nifurtimox group was younger than the untreated group (mean, 32.4 vs. 40.3 years), with proportionally fewer females (47.9% vs. 60.1%), and proportionally more of the nifurtimox group than the untreated group had clinical signs and symptoms of Chagas disease at diagnosis (28.9% vs. 14.0%). Median maximum daily dose of nifurtimox was 8.0 mg/kg/day (interquartile range [IQR]: 8.0-9.0) and median treatment duration was 44 days (IQR: 1-90). Median time to event was 2.1 years (IQR: 1.0-4.5) for nifurtimox-treated and 2.4 years (IQR: 1.0-4.2) for untreated patients. Accounting for potential confounders, the estimated hazard ratio (95% confidence interval) for negative seroconversion was 2.22 (1.61-3.07) favoring nifurtimox. Variable treatment regimens and follow-up duration, and an uncommonly high rate of spontaneous negative seroconversion, complicate interpretation of this epidemiological study, but with the longest follow-up and largest cohort analyzed to date it lends weight to the benefit of nifurtimox in adults with chronic Chagas disease. Trial registration: The study protocol was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03784391.

Indexed as

AdultAntibodies, ProtozoanArgentinaChagas DiseaseChronic DiseaseFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNifurtimoxRetrospective StudiesTrypanocidal AgentsTrypanosoma cruziYoung AdultAntibodies, ProtozoanNifurtimoxTrypanocidal Agents

Identifiers

PMID34606501
PMCPMC8489720
OpenAlexW3203821404

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.