Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34606444›Full record

RevieweLife2021

Y chromosome functions in mammalian spermatogenesis.

Jeremie Subrini, James Turner

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in eLife, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Adropin: A New Regulator of Testicular Function-What Do We Know So Far?International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Sex Chromosome Evolution: Hallmarks and Question Marks.Molecular biology and evolution · 2024
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jeremie SubriniSex Chromosome Biology Laboratory, The Francis Crick Institute, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5633-0509
James TurnerSex Chromosome Biology Laboratory, The Francis Crick Institute, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1722-7677
The Francis Crick Institute · GB

Funding

Cancer Research UK FC001193Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The mammalian Y chromosome is critical for male sex determination and spermatogenesis. However, linking each Y gene to specific aspects of male reproduction has been challenging. As the Y chromosome is notoriously hard to sequence and target, functional studies have mostly relied on transgene-rescue approaches using mouse models with large multi-gene deletions. These experimental limitations have oriented the field toward the search for a minimum set of Y genes necessary for male reproduction. Here, considering Y-chromosome evolutionary history and decades of discoveries, we review the current state of research on its function in spermatogenesis and reassess the view that many Y genes are disposable for male reproduction.

Indexed as

AnimalsBiological EvolutionHumansMaleMammalsMiceSpermatogenesisY Chromosomedevelopmental biologyfertilityspermatogenesisY chromosome

Identifiers

PMID34606444
PMCPMC8489898
OpenAlexW3203309626

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.