Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34606149›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of health psychology2022

Holding a stigmatizing attitude at the start of the COVID-19 outbreak: A cross-sectional survey.

Louise E Smith, Henry W W Potts, Richard Amlȏt, Nicola T Fear, Susan Michie, G James Rubin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of health psychology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Are Healthcare Workers Infected with SARS-CoV-2 at Home or at Work? A Comparative Prevalence Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Louise E SmithKing's College London, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1277-2564
Henry W W PottsUniversity College London, Institute of Health Informatics, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6200-8804
Richard AmlȏtNIHR Health Protection Research Unit in Emergency Preparedness and Response, UK.
Nicola T FearKing's College London, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5792-2925
Susan MichieCentre for Behaviour Change, University College London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0063-6378
G James RubinKing's College London, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, UK.

Funding

Department of Health
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo identify the prevalence of a stigmatizing attitude towards people of Chinese origin at the start of the COVID-19 outbreak in the UK population and investigate factors associated with holding the stigmatizing attitude.

designOnline cross-sectional survey conducted 10-13 February 2020 (n = 2006, people aged 16 years or over and living in the UK).

methodsWe asked participants to what extent they agreed it was best to avoid areas heavily populated by Chinese people because of the COVID-19 outbreak. Survey materials also asked about: worry, perceived risk, knowledge, information receipt, perception of government response to COVID-19, and personal characteristics. We ran binary logistic regressions to investigate associations between holding a stigmatizing attitude, personal characteristics, and psychological and contextual factors.

results26.1% people (95% CI 24.2-28.0%, n = 524/2006) agreed it was best to avoid areas heavily populated by Chinese people. Holding a stigmatizing attitude was associated with greater worry about COVID-19, greater perceived risk of COVID-19, and poorer knowledge about COVID-19.

conclusionsAt the start of the COVID-19 pandemic, a large percentage of the UK public endorsed avoiding areas in the UK heavily populated by people of Chinese origin. This attitude was associated with greater worry about, and perceived risk of, the COVID-19 outbreak as well as poorer knowledge about COVID-19. At the start of future novel infectious disease outbreaks, proactive communications from official sources should provide context and facts to reduce uncertainty and challenge stigmatizing attitudes, to minimize harms to affected communities.

Indexed as

COVID-19AttitudeCross-Sectional StudiesDisease OutbreaksHumansPandemicsSARS-CoV-2Surveys and QuestionnairesCOVID-19discriminationinfectious disease outbreakstigmaworry

Identifiers

PMID34606149
PMCPMC8646234

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.