Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34606057›Full record

SynthesisEndocrine2022

Head-to-head comparison of FNA cytology vs. calcitonin measurement in FNA washout fluids (FNA-CT) to diagnose medullary thyroid carcinoma. A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Pierpaolo Trimboli, Jacopo Giannelli, Bernardo Marques, Arnoldo Piccardo, Anna Crescenzi, Maurilio Deandrea

Open access · hybridAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Endocrine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Epidemiology, Clinical Presentation, and Diagnosis of Medullary Thyroid Carcinoma.Recent results in cancer research. Fortschritte der Krebsforschung. Progres dans les recherches sur le cancer · 2025
    Review
  15. What Is New in Diagnostics and Management of Medullary Thyroid Carcinoma.Recent results in cancer research. Fortschritte der Krebsforschung. Progres dans les recherches sur le cancer · 2025
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Pierpaolo TrimboliServizio di Endocrinologia e Diabetologia, Ospedale Regionale di Lugano, Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale (EOC), Lugano, Switzerland. pierpaolo.trimboli@eoc.ch.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2125-4937
Jacopo GiannelliDivision of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Department of Medical Science, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
Bernardo MarquesEndocrinology Department, Hospital de Egas Moniz, Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Ocidental, EPE, Lisbon, Portugal.
Arnoldo PiccardoNuclear Medicine Department, Ente Ospedaliero "Ospedali Galliera", Genoa, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6779-1471
Anna CrescenziDepartment of Pathology, University Hospital Campus Bio-Medico, Rome, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8156-5753
Maurilio DeandreaUO Endocrinologia, Diabetologia e Malattie del metabolismo, AO Ordine Mauriziano Torino, Torino, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9217-8815
A. O. Ordine Mauriziano di Torino · ITEnte Ospedaliero Ospedali Galliera · ITHospital de Egas Moniz · PTOspedale regionale di Lugano · CHUniversità Campus Bio-Medico · ITUniversity of Turin · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe sensitivity of cytology after fine needle aspiration (FNA-cytology) in detecting medullary thyroid carcinoma (MTC) is low. To overcome this problem, measuring calcitonin (CT) in washout fluid of FNA (FNA-CT) has been largely diffused and showed good performance. However, no evidence-based study exists comparing systematically the sensitivity of FNA-cytology and FNA-CT. This study aimed to systematically review the literature and collect data allowing a head-to-head comparison meta-analysis between FNA-cytology and FNA-CT in detecting MTC lesions.

methodsThe online databases of PubMed/MEDLINE and Scopus were searched until June 2021. Original articles reporting the use of both FNA-cytology and FNA-CT in the same series of histologically proven MTC lesions were included They were extracted general features of each study, number of MTC lesions (nodule and neck lymph nodes), and true positive and false negatives of both FNA-cytology and FNA-CT.

resultsSix studies were included. The sensitivity of FNA-cytology varied from 20% to 86% with a pooled value of 54% (95% CI 35-73%) and significant heterogeneity. The sensitivity of FNA-CT was higher than 95% in almost all studies with a pooled value of 98% (95% CI 96-100%) without heterogeneity. The sensitivity of FNA-CT was significantly higher than that of FNA-cytology.

conclusionsFNA-CT is significantly more sensitive than FNA-cytology in detecting MTC. Accordingly, FNA-CT represents the standard method to use in patients with suspicious MTC lesions, combined with cytology.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, NeuroendocrineThyroid NeoplasmsThyroid NoduleBiopsy, Fine-NeedleCalcitoninHumansTomography, X-Ray ComputedCalcitoninCalcitoninCytologyFNAMedullary thyroid cancerMeta-analysisWashout

Identifiers

PMID34606057
PMCPMC8763758
OpenAlexW3204633792

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.