Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34606027›Full record

ArticleEcoHealth2021

Influence of Anthropic Environmental-Related Factors on Erysipelas in Wild Boar.

Nicoletta Formenti, Stefania Calò, Nicoletta Vitale, Helena Eriksson, Stefano Giovannini, Cristian Salogni, Mario D'Incau, Maria Lodovica Pacciarini, Mariagrazia Zanoni, Giovanni Loris Alborali and 1 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in EcoHealth, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Serological evidence ofJournal of veterinary research · 2024
    Article
  3. First Serologic Survey ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Nicoletta FormentiIstituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale Della Lombardia E Dell'Emilia Romagna ''Bruno Ubertini'', via Bianchi 7/9, 25124, Brescia, Italy. nicoletta_formenti@yahoo.it.
Stefania CalòIstituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale Della Lombardia E Dell'Emilia Romagna ''Bruno Ubertini'', via Bianchi 7/9, 25124, Brescia, Italy.
Nicoletta VitaleIstituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale Della Lombardia E Dell'Emilia Romagna ''Bruno Ubertini'', via Bianchi 7/9, 25124, Brescia, Italy.
Helena ErikssonNational Veterinary Institute, 75189, Uppsala, Sweden.
Stefano GiovanniniIstituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale Della Lombardia E Dell'Emilia Romagna ''Bruno Ubertini'', via Bianchi 7/9, 25124, Brescia, Italy.
Cristian SalogniIstituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale Della Lombardia E Dell'Emilia Romagna ''Bruno Ubertini'', via Bianchi 7/9, 25124, Brescia, Italy.
Mario D'IncauIstituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale Della Lombardia E Dell'Emilia Romagna ''Bruno Ubertini'', via Bianchi 7/9, 25124, Brescia, Italy.
Maria Lodovica PacciariniIstituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale Della Lombardia E Dell'Emilia Romagna ''Bruno Ubertini'', via Bianchi 7/9, 25124, Brescia, Italy.
Mariagrazia ZanoniIstituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale Della Lombardia E Dell'Emilia Romagna ''Bruno Ubertini'', via Bianchi 7/9, 25124, Brescia, Italy.
Giovanni Loris AlboraliIstituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale Della Lombardia E Dell'Emilia Romagna ''Bruno Ubertini'', via Bianchi 7/9, 25124, Brescia, Italy.
Mario ChiariIstituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale Della Lombardia E Dell'Emilia Romagna ''Bruno Ubertini'', via Bianchi 7/9, 25124, Brescia, Italy.
Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale della Lombardia e dell'Emilia Romagna "Bruno Ubertini" · ITSwedish Veterinary Agency · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae (ER) is an old but still emerging zoonotic infection that is not yet completely understood. ER infects a wide range of species and wild boar is of significant interest because of their similarities to pigs, a known ER reservoir. Moreover, the increase of its densities and the limited data available about ER in this species should be considered. The need is to investigate whether wild boar could represent a risk of erysipelas at the wildlife-domestic-human interface. Here, 1067 sera and 149 tonsils of wild boar from five hunting districts in Northwest Italy were tested using ELISA and bacteriological culture, respectively. Using generalized linear models, we evaluated host and environmental factors influencing ER spread and dynamics. We found an ER seroprevalence of 69.4% among wild boar. Increased human density and pig farm density lead to an increase of ER seropositivity highlighting its association with anthropic environmental-related factors. The high ER percentage of isolation (34.2%) found in healthy wild boar suggests that this species can serve as a healthy carrier. This fact, together with the high seroprevalence, supports a role of wild boar as an ER reservoir. Potential zoonotic and economic risks should be considered in light of these data.

Indexed as

ErysipelasSwine DiseasesAnimalsAnimals, WildSeroepidemiologic StudiesSus scrofaSwineErysipelothrix spp. coloniesFree-ranging host speciesHealthy carrierInfection trendSerologySus scrofa

Identifiers

PMID34606027
OpenAlexW3204171771

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.